Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

29178

in Whitmire, South CarolinaPopulation 3,280

43.24/ 100

Ranked #24,168 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #280 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.63 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.32 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

79.8%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.1%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.4%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

45.9%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.32 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

3.4 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 19% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

7.2 mi

in the top 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

Whitmire, South Carolina (ZIP 29178), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 25% nationally (24,168th) and the bottom 33% of South Carolina (280th).

continue reading

The profile opens on the burdens that define it most: modeled diabetes resides in the top 7.8% nationally, modeled stroke rests in the top 8.9% nationally, and households without a vehicle lies in the top 10.7% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure sits in the top 10.0% nationally, humid heat settles in the top 12.5% nationally, and self-care disability registers in the top 13.1% nationally. More positively, grocery stands in the top 1.0% nationally, and elder services lands in the top 4.2% nationally. Modeled tree cover is in the top 5.0% nationally, and pharmacy resides in the top 12.6% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, grocery runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 29031, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 75.7; chronic-disease standing 14.3 — 61 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,628 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.7%30.8–36.6
High blood pressure among adults45.9%42.4–49.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.4–9.9
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%8.1–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
Depression among adults23.1%20.2–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.1%16.3–20.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.6%38.0–45.0
Obesity among adults40.2%34.4–45.7
Stroke among adults5.4%5.0–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.1%18.3–24.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.8%11.0–14.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.7%81.8–85.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.8%79.1–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.8–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.1%62.1–70.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.9%55.8–62.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%70.8–81.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.2–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.8%15.6–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.5%29.4–37.7
Short sleep duration among adults36.4%31.8–41.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.2%22.6–28.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%16.1–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults16.9%15.2–18.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.6%14.9–18.4
Any disability among adults36.7%32.9–40.5
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.8–9.5
Independent living disability among adults11.3%10.2–12.4
Mobility disability among adults20.5%18.5–22.8
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.5–6.5
Vision disability among adults7.5%6.9–8.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.3%23.5–29.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.9%19.5–24.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.7%12.9–16.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.2%13.5–17.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.3%9.3–11.5
Loneliness among adults32.2%28.6–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.6–12.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410
Uninsured 18–649.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412
No HS diploma (25+)12.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414
Households without a vehicle12.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410
Broadband subscription83.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate86.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419
Single-parent households40.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404
Population 65+22.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419
Median age44.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415
Median household income$60,241$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384
Median home value$73,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383
Median gross rent$723$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$950 ($678–$1,545) n=343
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 1.0378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.03 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured