Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

23962

in Randolph, VirginiaPopulation 705

39.86/ 100

Ranked #26,853 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #778 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (bottom 10.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

41.4%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.7%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.5%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.5%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.3%

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

46.2%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.6%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

27.8%

in the top 13.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Randolph, Virginia (ZIP 23962) comes out in the bottom 16% nationally (26,853rd) and the bottom 10.9% of Virginia (778th).

continue reading

The profile opens on the burdens that define it most: home broadband subscription rests in the bottom 1.0% nationally, modeled diabetes lies in the top 5.6% nationally, and modeled stroke sits in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled mobility disability settles in the top 8.1% nationally, self-care disability registers in the top 8.5% nationally, and high blood pressure stands in the top 9.4% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol lands in the top 8.2% nationally. More positively, civic is in the top 1.9% nationally. Unemployment resides at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking rests in the bottom 8.5% nationally.

The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 23923, just across the boundary. Modeled stroke rests in the top 6.0% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.7%32.6–38.7
High blood pressure among adults46.2%42.6–49.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.2–9.7
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.8–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults9.8%8.8–10.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.4%10.0–13.0
Depression among adults23.6%20.8–26.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.0%17.1–21.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.6%39.9–47.2
Obesity among adults42.4%35.9–48.8
Stroke among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.8%15.4–20.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.8%8.9–13.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.5%79.3–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.9%78.2–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.3–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.5%65.5–73.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.4%53.5–59.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.2%69.5–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.3%10.4–14.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.7%17.1–22.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.8%28.7–37.3
Short sleep duration among adults40.4%35.3–45.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.8%24.7–31.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.7–20.4
Frequent physical distress among adults18.4%16.6–20.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.2%16.2–20.3
Any disability among adults40.6%36.6–44.9
Hearing disability among adults9.0%8.1–10.0
Independent living disability among adults11.9%10.7–13.4
Mobility disability among adults22.5%20.1–25.2
Self-care disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Vision disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.9%21.0–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.8%18.0–23.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.4%17.5–23.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.9%13.1–17.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.6–12.2
Loneliness among adults34.1%30.1–38.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.3–12.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–6431.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)24.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle8.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription41.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate80.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households68.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+25.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age52.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$76,806$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$86,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$847$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.2 yr ± 1.2178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.21 years of 77.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured