ZIP code
36758
in Plantersville, AlabamaPopulation 1,484
39.24/ 100
Ranked #27,245 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 15%)
Ranked #426 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 31%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
High blood pressure
51.8%
in the top 2.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST83rdUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
41.6%
in the top 2.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Arsenic in groundwater
1.1%
in the bottom 3.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST25thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
19.3%
in the top 5.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST79thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
46.2%
in the top 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
66.7%
in the bottom 4.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST9thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
22.6%
in the top 7.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST75thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
6.5%
in the top 8.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST76thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Stroke
5.5%
in the top 7.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST76thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
12.0%
in the bottom 6.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST22ndUS7thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›The read
In overall standing, Plantersville, Alabama (ZIP 36758) comes out in the bottom 15% nationally (27,245th) and the bottom 31% of Alabama (426th).
The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: modeled arsenic rests in the bottom 3.1% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled high blood pressure sits in the top 2.0% nationally, and poverty settles in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled diabetes registers in the top 5.0% nationally, and high cholesterol stands in the top 2.5% nationally. Home broadband subscription lands in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and modeled mobility disability is in the top 7.8% nationally. Modeled self-care disability resides in the top 8.5% nationally, and stroke rests in the top 7.8% nationally.
In plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 36006, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 88%
14%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 56%
13%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 6%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 12%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 19%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 38%
8%
Disability
healthier than 10%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 31%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 30%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 83%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 64%
13%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 58%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 56%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 19%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 25%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 35%
11%
Disability
healthier than 30%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 26%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 88.4; chronic-disease standing 6.2 (bottom 10%) — 82 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #394 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
36006
Alabamashares a border
Score 40.17
Closest healthier
36750
Alabamashares a border
Score 43.27
Similar health profile
36036
Alabama100% similar profile
Score 36.66
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 36.5% | 33.8–39.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 51.8% | 48.5–54.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.0% | 8.3–9.7 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.8% | 9.8–11.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.5% | 8.7–10.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 11.2% | 10.0–12.3 |
| Depression among adults | 23.3% | 20.7–26.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 19.3% | 17.5–21.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 46.2% | 42.9–49.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 43.8% | 38.6–49.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.5% | 5.1–6.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 21.8% | 19.0–24.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.4% | 9.0–12.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 81.7% | 79.7–83.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 82.4% | 80.0–84.6 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.0% | 85.5–88.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.3% | 61.5–68.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 49.9% | 46.7–53.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 77.6% | 72.7–81.8 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.0% | 10.3–13.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 19.6% | 17.3–21.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 34.5% | 30.6–38.1 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 41.1% | 36.6–45.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 29.0% | 26.3–31.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.0% | 16.4–19.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.5% | 15.8–19.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.9% | 16.2–19.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 42.0% | 38.4–45.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.0% | 9.1–10.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.1% | 10.9–13.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 22.6% | 20.5–24.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.5% | 6.0–7.1 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.9% | 7.2–8.6 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 26.3% | 23.6–29.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 24.1% | 21.5–26.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 20.2% | 17.8–22.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 16.6% | 14.9–18.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 11.7% | 10.5–12.9 |
| Loneliness among adults | 35.2% | 31.6–38.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 12.3% | 11.0–13.6 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 41.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 3.2% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 13.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 27.3% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 13.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 9.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 16.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622 |
| Households without a vehicle | 4.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622 |
| Broadband subscription | 66.7% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 84.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 21.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622 |
| Homeownership rate | 78.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628 |
| Single-parent households | 39.8% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 50.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617 |
| Population 65+ | 15.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628 |
| Median age | 37.9 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587 |
| Median home value | $93,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568 |
| Median gross rent | $825 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $856 ($625–$1,266) n=503 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 73.3 yr ± 0.81 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 74.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 73.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured