ZIP code
29015
in Blair, South CarolinaPopulation 1,255
43.22/ 100
Ranked #24,190 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)
Ranked #281 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (bottom 33%)
Ranked #39 of 47 Columbia, SC ZIPs (bottom 17%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Diabetes
21.7%
in the top 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
51.7%
in the top 2.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Fatal road crashes
63.7 per 100,000 residents per year
in the top 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS98thDefinition & source ›
The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.
A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.
Full methodology ›Stroke
6.2%
in the top 3.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST89thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
6.5%
in the bottom 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Obesity
47.3%
in the top 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
11.3%
in the bottom 4.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Unemployment rate
13.0%
in the top 5.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
6.8%
in the top 6.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST79thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
22.6%
in the top 7.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST84thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›The read
By its overall health score, Blair, South Carolina (ZIP 29015) lands in the bottom 25% nationally (24,190th) and the bottom 33% of South Carolina (281st).
The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: modeled diabetes rests in the top 1.9% nationally, and high blood pressure is in the top 2.1% nationally. Fatal road crashes stands in the top 1.9% nationally, and modeled stroke settles in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled obesity lies in the top 1.9% nationally, unemployment resides in the top 5.3% nationally, and modeled self-care disability lands in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled mobility disability registers in the top 7.8% nationally. Better still, modeled pfas sits in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and binge drinking rests in the bottom 4.0% nationally.
To translate a couple of terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 29014, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Columbia, SC metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 92%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 81%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 80%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 8%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 5%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 38%
11%
Disability
healthier than 17%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 24%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 15%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 88%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 80%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 89%
8%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 47%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 11%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 10%
16%
Disability
healthier than 30%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 38%
5%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.8%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 98%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 70%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 96%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 2%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
in the bottom 0.00%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 37%
11%
Disability
healthier than 17%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 37%
5%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 92.1 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 8.0 (bottom 10%) — 84 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #317 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
29014
South Carolinashares a border
Score 46.77
Closest healthier
29031
South Carolinashares a border
Score 43.78
Similar health profile
29580
South Carolina99% similar profile
Score 41.38
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 33.3% | 29.5–37.0 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 51.7% | 47.3–56.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.5% | 6.8–8.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.8% | 9.6–12.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.5% | 7.5–9.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.4% | 8.0–10.9 |
| Depression among adults | 18.3% | 15.4–21.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 21.7% | 19.0–24.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 42.6% | 38.3–47.2 |
| Obesity among adults | 47.3% | 39.3–55.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 6.2% | 5.4–6.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 22.0% | 18.4–26.1 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 13.5% | 10.7–16.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 84.8% | 82.5–86.8 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 84.7% | 81.9–87.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 89.1% | 87.4–90.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 70.9% | 66.1–75.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 56.6% | 53.0–60.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 77.4% | 70.2–83.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 11.3% | 9.2–13.7 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 16.7% | 14.0–19.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 34.1% | 28.7–39.8 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 40.0% | 33.3–47.3 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 27.6% | 23.8–31.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.5% | 14.6–18.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.5% | 14.4–18.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.5% | 13.4–17.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 37.1% | 32.3–42.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 6.9% | 6.0–7.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.2% | 9.7–12.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 22.6% | 19.5–26.0 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.8% | 5.8–7.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 8.4% | 7.3–9.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 30.8% | 26.5–35.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 28.3% | 23.5–33.5 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 18.9% | 15.2–22.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 21.0% | 17.6–24.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 12.3% | 10.4–14.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 34.7% | 29.6–40.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 14.1% | 12.0–16.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | SC median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 12.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 10.8% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 19.3% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 11.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 10.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 20.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 13.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414 |
| Households without a vehicle | 5.8% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410 |
| Broadband subscription | 84.5% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 86.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 21.6% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 23.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410 |
| Homeownership rate | 79.6% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 77.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 6.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.4% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 2.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419 |
| Single-parent households | 54.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 50.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404 |
| Population 65+ | 23.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419 |
| Median age | 48.7 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415 |
| Median household income | $43,977 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384 |
| Median home value | $106,600 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383 |
| Median gross rent | $813 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $950 ($678–$1,545) n=343 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | SC median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.5 yr ± 1.66 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 76.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.66 years of 77.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured