Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27832

in Gaston, North CarolinaPopulation 2,783

35.51/ 100

Ranked #29,185 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.0%)

Ranked #755 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 4.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Stroke

6.9%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.1%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

21.1%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

26.1%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

52.5%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.1%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.9%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

26.9%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.4%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

30.9%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

Gaston, North Carolina (ZIP 27832), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 9.0% nationally (29,185th) and the bottom 4.8% of North Carolina (755th).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: modeled stroke rests in the top 1.4% nationally, self-care disability sits in the top 2.6% nationally, and diabetes registers in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lands in the top 2.3% nationally, high blood pressure resides in the top 1.7% nationally, and vision disability lies in the top 5.1% nationally. Modeled tooth loss settles in the top 5.3% nationally, and independent living disability stands in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health is in the top 6.8% nationally. More positively, modeled binge drinking rests in the bottom 1.4% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 23847, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.7%33.7–41.8
High blood pressure among adults52.5%47.8–57.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.9–9.6
Current asthma among adults12.8%11.3–14.6
Coronary heart disease among adults10.7%9.5–11.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.5%11.1–14.1
Depression among adults23.4%19.9–27.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults21.1%18.5–23.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.1%36.4–46.0
Obesity among adults45.0%36.2–54.3
Stroke among adults6.9%6.3–7.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years26.9%22.3–31.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.3%10.2–14.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.3%80.8–85.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.6%81.6–87.4
Cholesterol screening among adults88.9%87.2–90.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.3%61.6–72.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.6%48.2–56.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.7%72.2–85.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.1%8.1–12.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.4%17.6–23.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.3%30.9–41.5
Short sleep duration among adults40.1%32.6–47.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.9%27.3–34.6
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.1–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults18.0%15.8–20.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.7%16.5–21.0
Any disability among adults44.6%39.5–49.5
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Independent living disability among adults13.4%11.9–15.0
Mobility disability among adults26.1%22.9–29.2
Self-care disability among adults8.1%7.3–9.0
Vision disability among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.7%23.8–32.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.2%24.5–32.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults27.6%24.1–31.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.2%17.5–23.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.8%12.1–15.6
Loneliness among adults34.7%29.4–40.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.0%13.1–17.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6415.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)12.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)6.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription78.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate69.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population0.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households43.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+26.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age49.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$52,194$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$113,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$821$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.1 yr ± 2.0078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.00 years of 75.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured