Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

29518

in Cades, South CarolinaPopulation 1,121

41.62/ 100

Ranked #25,553 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #311 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

80.3 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19.3%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.5%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.6%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.4%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

17.2 mi

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.6%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.4%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Cades, South Carolina (ZIP 29518) places in the bottom 20% nationally (25,553rd) and the bottom 25% of South Carolina (311th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled pfas lands in the bottom 8.2% nationally, and binge drinking stands in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Pulling the other way, fatal road crashes registers in the top 0.9% nationally, and modeled diabetes settles in the top 5.0% nationally. Modeled stroke sits in the top 5.3% nationally, high blood pressure lies in the top 5.2% nationally, and self-care disability rests in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled mobility disability resides in the top 8.4% nationally, distance to an emergency room is in the top 8.1% nationally, and modeled food insecurity lands in the top 10.5% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 29111, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 75.9; chronic-disease standing 9.4 (bottom 10%) — 67 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,296 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.4%31.0–37.7
High blood pressure among adults48.5%44.4–52.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.3–10.2
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.3–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.3%9.9–12.7
Depression among adults22.8%19.5–26.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.3%17.1–21.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.7%37.6–45.8
Obesity among adults43.0%36.3–49.9
Stroke among adults5.8%5.3–6.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.7%16.3–23.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.7%11.4–16.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.0%81.7–85.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.8%79.8–85.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.3–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.4%62.6–71.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.1%54.4–61.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.7%69.8–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.4%10.2–14.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.2%15.6–20.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.6%28.9–38.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.0%29.6–40.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.3%24.9–31.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.1–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults17.7%15.7–19.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.2%15.2–19.2
Any disability among adults41.1%36.6–45.5
Hearing disability among adults9.0%8.0–10.0
Independent living disability among adults12.1%10.7–13.5
Mobility disability among adults22.4%19.7–25.0
Self-care disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Vision disability among adults8.3%7.5–9.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.2%22.8–29.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.5%22.1–28.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.0%15.5–20.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.8%15.4–20.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
Loneliness among adults34.0%29.4–38.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.5%11.0–14.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410
Uninsured 18–6432.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412
No HS diploma (25+)6.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)4.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414
Households without a vehicle1.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410
Broadband subscription84.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate76.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419
Single-parent households54.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404
Population 65+21.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419
Median age35.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415
Median household income$61,923$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384
Median home value$212,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383
Median gross rent$1,019$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$950 ($678–$1,545) n=343
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.4 yr ± 1.2778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.27 years of 72.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured