Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

24592

in South Boston, VirginiaPopulation 14,589

41.86/ 100

Ranked #25,330 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #739 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.37 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.89 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19.3%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.0%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

47.7%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.6%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

South Boston, Virginia (ZIP 24592), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 21% nationally (25,330th) and the bottom 15% of Virginia (739th).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: modeled diabetes is in the top 5.0% nationally, stroke rests in the top 5.3% nationally, and mobility disability sits in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure registers in the top 6.5% nationally. Better still, mental-health providers lands in the top 1.5% nationally, and outpatient resides in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled binge drinking lies in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and elder services settles in the top 4.6% nationally. Distance to an emergency room stands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic is in the bottom 6.5% nationally.

In everyday language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 24520, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.8 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $51,547 predicts 77.5 years — 1.7 years below.

    Ranked #2,064 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.9%31.6–38.4
High blood pressure among adults47.7%43.5–51.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.2–9.8
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.6–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults9.6%8.8–10.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.9%9.7–12.1
Depression among adults22.1%19.0–25.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.3%17.1–21.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.8%38.4–47.2
Obesity among adults41.3%33.9–48.8
Stroke among adults5.8%5.4–6.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.5%15.4–22.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.0%9.4–12.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.8%79.4–84.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.5%78.4–84.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.7–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.3%63.7–72.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.5%57.1–64.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%70.6–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.0%8.9–13.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.3%16.0–20.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.9%29.3–38.6
Short sleep duration among adults37.9%32.0–44.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.5%24.6–30.6
Frequent mental distress among adults18.1%16.2–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults17.8%15.9–19.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.8%15.9–19.9
Any disability among adults40.4%36.0–44.7
Hearing disability among adults8.9%8.0–9.9
Independent living disability among adults12.4%11.1–13.7
Mobility disability among adults23.0%20.6–25.4
Self-care disability among adults6.6%6.0–7.2
Vision disability among adults8.3%7.6–9.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.9%20.5–27.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.0%20.2–26.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.4%20.6–26.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.7%14.6–18.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.9%10.6–13.4
Loneliness among adults35.4%30.2–40.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.9–14.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–647.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)14.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle8.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription73.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate63.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population2.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households43.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+22.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age42.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$51,547$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$168,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$778$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.8 yr ± 0.7578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.75 years of 75.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured