Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27819

in Conetoe, North CarolinaPopulation 561

35.49/ 100

Ranked #29,192 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.0%)

Ranked #756 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 4.7%)

Ranked #14 of 15 Rocky Mount, NC ZIPs (bottom 6.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Stroke

7.5%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

23.7%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

44.3%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

56.7%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.3%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

74.5%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

8.9%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

27.4%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.2%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

27.2%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People living in poverty
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Households with no vehicle

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

By the composite health measure, Conetoe, North Carolina (ZIP 27819) ranks in the bottom 9.0% nationally (29,192nd) and the bottom 4.7% of North Carolina (756th).

continue reading

A number of measures mark what daily life looks like here: modeled stroke sits in the top 0.6% nationally, and diabetes is in the top 0.9% nationally. Crowded housing settles in the top 0.3% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure resides in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled self-care disability registers in the top 2.3% nationally, poverty rests in the top 0.6% nationally, and modeled mobility disability stands in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled vision disability lies in the top 4.5% nationally, and tooth loss lands in the top 5.0% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled binge drinking sits in the bottom 0.4% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, crowded housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Close by, ZIP 27812, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall. On other measures, the area also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Rocky Mount, NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 1%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults40.2%35.9–44.5
High blood pressure among adults56.7%51.9–61.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.8–9.7
Current asthma among adults12.8%11.1–14.3
Coronary heart disease among adults11.0%9.6–12.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.6%10.7–14.4
Depression among adults21.2%17.7–24.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults23.7%20.6–26.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.6%37.4–47.5
Obesity among adults46.9%37.7–55.6
Stroke among adults7.5%6.6–8.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years27.2%22.8–31.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.7%9.4–14.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure86.0%83.6–88.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults86.1%83.2–88.6
Cholesterol screening among adults90.6%88.9–91.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%65.5–75.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.7%46.6–54.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.7%71.5–85.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults8.9%7.0–11.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.9%15.7–22.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.4%31.4–43.3
Short sleep duration among adults39.2%32.2–46.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.9%26.6–35.1
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.7–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults18.0%15.6–20.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.0%14.8–19.3
Any disability among adults43.8%38.1–49.0
Hearing disability among adults9.1%7.9–10.3
Independent living disability among adults12.8%11.1–14.5
Mobility disability among adults27.4%23.7–31.1
Self-care disability among adults8.3%7.2–9.5
Vision disability among adults10.2%8.9–11.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.1%23.4–31.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.1%23.8–32.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults28.2%23.6–32.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.5%16.6–22.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.6–15.3
Loneliness among adults33.1%28.4–38.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.7–16.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate74.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6446.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)14.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)7.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)5.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle13.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription91.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)48.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate36.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)44.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households27.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+9.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age19.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$38,776$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$86,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$1,055$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 1.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.67 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured