Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27812

in Bethel, North CarolinaPopulation 2,188

43.29/ 100

Ranked #24,119 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #631 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #9 of 11 Greenville, NC ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

54.8 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.6%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.8%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.42 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

11.2%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

44.2%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0.00022 ppb

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

US10th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.3%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

46.2%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Bethel, North Carolina (ZIP 27812), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 25% nationally (24,119th) and the bottom 20% of North Carolina (631st).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled binge drinking stands in the bottom 5.8% nationally, pharmacy is in the top 7.3% nationally, and lead in tap water rests in the bottom 9.6% nationally. Working the other way, fatal road crashes sits in the top 3.0% nationally, modeled stroke registers in the top 6.9% nationally, and unemployment lands in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled diabetes resides in the top 8.1% nationally, and obesity lies in the top 5.8% nationally. Modeled self-care disability settles in the top 9.7% nationally, and high blood pressure stands in the top 9.4% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 27834, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Greenville, NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 79.0; chronic-disease standing 13.6 — 65 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,358 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.1%29.9–36.5
High blood pressure among adults46.2%42.3–50.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.7–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.7–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%8.5–10.9
Depression among adults22.5%19.4–25.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.0%15.8–20.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.5%34.5–42.5
Obesity among adults44.2%37.5–51.1
Stroke among adults5.6%5.1–6.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.8%17.5–24.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.2%10.2–14.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.0%79.6–84.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.5%79.5–85.1
Cholesterol screening among adults88.0%86.2–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.9%62.0–71.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.2%53.5–60.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.7%70.6–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.8%9.7–14.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.7%15.1–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.1%27.5–36.9
Short sleep duration among adults38.6%32.4–44.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.6%22.5–28.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.4–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.6–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.0%15.0–19.1
Any disability among adults38.6%34.1–43.0
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.1–9.0
Independent living disability among adults11.1%9.8–12.4
Mobility disability among adults21.1%18.6–23.8
Self-care disability among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Vision disability among adults8.0%7.2–8.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.4%23.7–31.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.8%20.6–27.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.9%18.9–25.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.2%15.8–20.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.6–13.5
Loneliness among adults34.9%30.2–39.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.2–14.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6412.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)12.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)11.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle9.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription75.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate69.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population1.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households36.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+24.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age42.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$53,268$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$112,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$725$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 1.1678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.16 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured