Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27957

in Merry Hill, North CarolinaPopulation 1,012

40.43/ 100

Ranked #26,459 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #706 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 11.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

79.1 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.3%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

50.9%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

59.2%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

50.7%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

24.2%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.8%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19.3%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

Merry Hill, North Carolina (ZIP 27957), overall, ranks in the bottom 17% nationally (26,459th) and the bottom 11.0% of North Carolina (706th).

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: fatal road crashes stands in the top 1.0% nationally, modeled stroke rests in the top 2.8% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure registers in the top 2.6% nationally. Home broadband subscription resides in the bottom 2.8% nationally, housing-cost burden settles in the top 2.9% nationally, and households without a vehicle is in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled diabetes sits in the top 5.0% nationally. On the better side, civic lands in the top 1.7% nationally, and modeled binge drinking lies in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Lead in tap water stands at the national minimum.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, civic runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. ZIP 27924, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 93.8 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 4.7 (bottom 10%) — 89 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #146 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.3%33.2–41.5
High blood pressure among adults50.9%46.1–55.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.8–10.8
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.5–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.7%10.0–13.5
Depression among adults23.0%19.4–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.3%16.8–22.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.7%37.8–47.6
Obesity among adults41.4%32.7–50.5
Stroke among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.2%17.7–25.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.1%9.0–13.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.6%81.1–86.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.2%81.1–87.0
Cholesterol screening among adults89.8%88.2–91.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.9%61.6–71.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.3%50.3–58.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.3%68.4–83.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.8%8.7–13.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.2%15.3–21.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.2%27.7–38.8
Short sleep duration among adults39.7%32.5–47.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.4%23.7–31.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%14.7–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.9%14.7–19.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%14.5–19.0
Any disability among adults41.1%35.9–46.4
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Independent living disability among adults11.6%10.2–13.2
Mobility disability among adults23.5%20.3–26.8
Self-care disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.7
Vision disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.3%21.6–29.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.2%18.9–25.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.8%17.5–24.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.6%13.2–18.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.4–12.4
Loneliness among adults32.8%27.6–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.9–13.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6444.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)29.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle24.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription59.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)50.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate68.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households78.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+48.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age63.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$36,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$140,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$935$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 1.3278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.32 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured