Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27047

in Siloam, North CarolinaPopulation 1,247

47.79/ 100

Ranked #19,194 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #476 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

5.2%

in the top 13.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

12.9%

in the bottom 14.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

8.3 mi

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US16th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

8.8 mi

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US77th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

62.1%

in the bottom 23% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

Siloam, North Carolina (ZIP 27047), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 40% nationally (19,194th) and the bottom 40% of North Carolina (476th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: fiber broadband resides at the national maximum. Households without a vehicle rests at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden lies in the bottom 14.1% nationally, and modeled disaster risk sits in the bottom 16% nationally. Modeled transportation noise settles in the bottom 18% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure registers at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover stands in the top 18% nationally. By contrast, crowded housing lands in the top 13.1% nationally, and distance to a nursing home is in the top 15% nationally. Recreation resides at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 27011, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.6%28.0–35.2
High blood pressure among adults39.3%34.8–43.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.1–11.2
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.7–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.1–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%7.5–10.9
Depression among adults27.4%23.4–31.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%10.6–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%34.8–43.8
Obesity among adults39.5%31.6–47.6
Stroke among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.0%15.3–22.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%7.1–11.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%75.6–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%76.9–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.8%85.5–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.1%56.2–67.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.7%55.5–63.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.8%66.7–81.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.4%11.6–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%12.5–19.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.6%20.9–30.7
Short sleep duration among adults33.1%26.3–39.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.5%17.1–24.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.0–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.4–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.8%13.4–18.5
Any disability among adults36.4%31.4–41.6
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.3–10.9
Independent living disability among adults9.1%7.7–10.6
Mobility disability among adults16.6%13.8–19.5
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.7–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.7–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.1%16.4–23.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.0%10.0–16.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.0%8.3–13.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%7.9–12.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.1–8.9
Loneliness among adults30.7%25.5–36.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.6–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–646.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)7.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)6.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription84.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate85.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households48.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+8.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age35.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$71,146$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$214,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$763$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.3 yr ± 2.1878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.18 years of 80.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured