Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38459

in Frankewing, TennesseePopulation 541

44.93/ 100

Ranked #22,486 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #190 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

4.9%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

8.3 mi

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

4.6%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US26th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$96,429

in the top 21% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US79th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

7.0%

in the bottom 32% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US32nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 41% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US59th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Frankewing, Tennessee (ZIP 38459) sits in the bottom 30% nationally (22,486th) and the top 31% of Tennessee (190th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: home broadband subscription registers at the national maximum, and housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 5.1% nationally. Unemployment resides at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk settles in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Crowded housing stands at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is in the top 17% nationally, and modeled binge drinking rests in the bottom 16% nationally. On the other hand, modeled high cholesterol sits in the top 10.2% nationally, and distance to a nursing home registers in the top 15% nationally.

In plain language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. ZIP 38488, about 5.7 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.5%33.0–40.1
High blood pressure among adults42.6%38.6–46.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.5–11.6
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.0–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%8.2–12.5
Depression among adults28.9%25.5–32.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.6%12.5–16.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.1%39.3–47.2
Obesity among adults39.2%32.4–46.3
Stroke among adults4.1%3.5–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.7%13.9–19.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.7%7.3–12.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%76.7–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%76.5–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults89.0%87.1–90.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.0%60.3–69.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.6%57.3–63.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.4%65.2–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.2%11.2–15.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.3%14.5–22.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.0%22.1–32.5
Short sleep duration among adults37.1%31.6–43.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.2%19.1–27.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.1–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.2–19.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.0%14.3–20.0
Any disability among adults36.8%31.7–42.2
Hearing disability among adults9.0%7.8–10.3
Independent living disability among adults9.6%7.9–11.5
Mobility disability among adults18.1%15.0–21.6
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.5–5.3
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.4–6.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–648.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)11.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)4.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate86.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households46.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+9.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age20.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$96,429$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$311,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 1.2278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.22 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured