Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27006

in Advance, North CarolinaPopulation 16,247

60.07/ 100

Ranked #4,805 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 15.0%)

Ranked #102 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (top 12.9%)

Ranked #5 of 39 Winston-Salem, NC ZIPs (top 12.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

100%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.0%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.5%

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.7%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.5%

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.94 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

4.2%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

7.0%

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Advance, North Carolina (ZIP 27006) sits in the top 15.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,805th) and the top 12.9% of North Carolina (102nd).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: fiber broadband resides in the top 1.9% nationally, lead in tap water sits at the national minimum, and modeled housing insecurity stands in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Modeled short sleep resides in the bottom 7.5% nationally, transportation sits in the bottom 8.7% nationally, and utility shutoff stands in the bottom 9.7% nationally. Modeled food insecurity resides in the bottom 9.8% nationally, and recreation sits in the top 10.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center stands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled energy burden resides in the bottom 10.6% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 27012, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Winston-Salem, NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 79.4 ± 1.3 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.4 years — 2.9 years above them.

    Ranked #875 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.6%28.9–36.5
High blood pressure among adults39.5%35.1–44.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.5%10.5–12.6
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.2–8.2
Depression among adults24.0%20.4–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%9.9–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%35.3–44.7
Obesity among adults31.5%24.1–39.7
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.2%7.4–11.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.9–8.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%77.6–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.1%78.8–85.1
Cholesterol screening among adults91.1%89.7–92.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.9%66.2–75.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.3%67.9–74.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.6%72.9–85.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%11.5–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.5%9.8–13.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.7%17.1–24.9
Short sleep duration among adults29.5%23.8–35.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.9%13.7–18.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.1%12.5–16.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.3%10.8–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.2%10.7–13.9
Any disability among adults30.8%26.9–35.3
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.8–10.0
Independent living disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.8
Mobility disability among adults13.8%11.9–15.9
Self-care disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.7%15.7–21.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.1–10.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.3–7.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.9–8.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
Loneliness among adults29.2%24.4–34.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.0–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–649.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)4.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)38.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle6.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription94.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate87.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population3.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households55.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+27.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age48.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$96,580$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$334,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$1,009$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.3 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 79.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured