Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27024

in Lowgap, North CarolinaPopulation 2,387

46.45/ 100

Ranked #20,812 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #522 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

99.2%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

71.8%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

1.2%

in the bottom 13.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.53%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US81st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Lowgap, North Carolina (ZIP 27024) places in the bottom 35% nationally (20,812th) and the bottom 34% of North Carolina (522nd).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: fiber broadband sits in the top 4.2% nationally, and modeled tree cover lies in the top 8.3% nationally. Modeled arsenic rests in the bottom 12.7% nationally, and floodplain exposure resides in the bottom 13.2% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is in the bottom 21% nationally. On the other side, recreation lands at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle stands in the top 18% nationally. Physicians registers at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Slow internet speeds settles in the top 19% nationally, and home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 21% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 27017, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 86.6; chronic-disease standing 26.5 — 60 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,719 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.5%27.9–35.4
High blood pressure among adults39.4%34.9–43.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.5–10.4
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.1–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.4–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%8.8–11.8
Depression among adults28.0%23.9–32.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%11.0–14.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%35.2–44.3
Obesity among adults40.2%32.2–48.4
Stroke among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.0%15.3–22.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.4%9.2–14.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.7%74.5–80.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%75.7–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.5–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.4%58.9–69.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.0%53.9–61.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%67.5–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%11.9–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.4%15.4–21.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.0%23.3–33.3
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%25.8–39.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.1%19.8–26.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.1–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.6–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.6%15.3–20.2
Any disability among adults38.4%33.5–43.9
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.5–10.8
Independent living disability among adults10.0%8.7–11.4
Mobility disability among adults17.7%15.2–20.6
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.3%18.9–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.6%13.0–18.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.0%10.7–15.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.5–13.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.1–9.6
Loneliness among adults32.5%27.5–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.4–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6415.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)29.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle8.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription81.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate85.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households62.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+31.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age54.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$62,813$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$188,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$662$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.5 yr ± 1.0478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.04 years of 75.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured