Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49064

in Lawrence, MichiganPopulation 3,635

42.54/ 100

Ranked #24,781 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #869 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 10.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Cognitive disability

18.2%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

25.7%

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US80th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

19.6%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

72.1%

in the bottom 25% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US25th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Lawrence, Michigan (ZIP 49064) places in the bottom 23% nationally (24,781st) and the bottom 10.7% of Michigan (869th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: outer-floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Floodplain exposure lies in the bottom 19% nationally. Pulling the other way, distance to a nursing home rests in the top 13.0% nationally, modeled independent living disability resides in the top 15% nationally, and modeled obesity is in the top 15% nationally. Recreation lands at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Modeled utility shutoff stands in the top 18% nationally, and food insecurity registers in the top 19% nationally. Physicians settles at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Fatal road crashes sits in the top 20% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 49045, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 89.6; chronic-disease standing 16.9 — 73 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #905 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.1%30.9–37.8
High blood pressure among adults39.9%36.0–44.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.6–10.5
Current asthma among adults12.3%10.9–13.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%8.1–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.5%10.0–13.0
Depression among adults28.8%25.0–32.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.1%13.1–17.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%33.9–42.3
Obesity among adults41.5%34.4–49.2
Stroke among adults4.6%4.1–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.6%16.1–23.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.9%9.2–13.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%75.6–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%76.4–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%83.9–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.0%65.1–74.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.2%57.5–64.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.1%63.8–79.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.0–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.2%16.4–22.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.7%27.1–36.8
Short sleep duration among adults34.4%28.3–41.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.7%22.5–29.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.7%17.5–22.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.9%15.8–20.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.2%16.1–20.5
Any disability among adults38.5%34.1–43.3
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.5–10.6
Independent living disability among adults11.4%10.1–12.9
Mobility disability among adults19.0%16.5–21.6
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Vision disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.4%19.9–27.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.6%17.5–24.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.5%17.3–23.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.7%12.7–17.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.2–12.0
Loneliness among adults32.4%27.5–37.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.4–12.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–649.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)15.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)3.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle8.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription87.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate78.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population8.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households58.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+18.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age41.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$68,607$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$171,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$618$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.3 yr ± 1.2178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.21 years of 79.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured