ZIP code
25260
in Mason, West VirginiaPopulation 1,298
27.07/ 100
Ranked #31,233 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.6%)
Ranked #574 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 18%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Tooth loss
30%
in the top 3.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST81stUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
14.1%
in the top 3.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST80thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
46.7%
in the top 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST79thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
24.5%
in the top 4.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST78thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
21.7%
in the top 4.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST76thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
31.8%
in the top 5.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST75thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Industrial-pollution burden
in the top 3.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Recreation access
1.4 per 1,000 residents
in the top 3.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 4.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS4thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
43.7%
in the top 5.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST67thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›The read
Mason, West Virginia (ZIP 25260), overall, ranks in the bottom 2.6% nationally (31,233rd) and the bottom 18% of West Virginia (574th).
Reading across the data, the real pressures come first: modeled tooth loss sits in the top 3.2% nationally, independent living disability lands in the top 3.9% nationally, and high cholesterol lies in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled mobility disability stands in the top 4.2% nationally, cognitive disability rests in the top 4.4% nationally, and fair or poor health registers in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 3.9% nationally, and short sleep settles in the top 5.1% nationally. More encouragingly, recreation is in the top 3.9% nationally, and modeled disaster risk sits in the bottom 4.3% nationally.
Measured against the nearby ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 25247, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 41%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 46%
13%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 57%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 1%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 16%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 3%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 1%
8%
Disability
healthier than 5%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 12%
5%
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 41%
13%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 56%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 21%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 39%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 32%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 30%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 27%
8%
Disability
healthier than 22%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 1%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
25247
West Virginiashares a border
Score 29.15
Closest healthier
25287
West Virginiashares a border
Score 31.11
Similar health profile
25067
West Virginia99% similar profile
Score 27.40
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 43.1% | 39.2–47.0 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 48.4% | 43.9–52.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.7% | 9.6–11.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 13.3% | 11.8–15.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.8% | 9.5–12.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 14.9% | 12.9–16.8 |
| Depression among adults | 32.5% | 28.3–37.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 19.0% | 16.5–21.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 46.7% | 42.1–51.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 42.9% | 35.1–51.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.4% | 4.8–6.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 30.0% | 25.5–34.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.2% | 8.4–12.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.2% | 79.6–84.4 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 81.7% | 78.4–84.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.1% | 84.2–88.0 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 66.1% | 61.1–70.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 47.0% | 43.1–50.8 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 74.8% | 67.3–81.3 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 11.8% | 9.5–14.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 24.6% | 21.2–28.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 40.8% | 35.1–46.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 43.7% | 37.1–50.4 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 31.8% | 27.9–36.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 22.6% | 20.2–25.3 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 21.2% | 18.7–23.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 21.7% | 19.2–24.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 46.0% | 40.9–51.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.9% | 9.6–12.2 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 14.1% | 12.3–15.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 24.5% | 21.4–27.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.2% | 5.5–7.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.7% | 6.8–8.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.6% | 19.0–28.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 21.2% | 17.3–25.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 25.3% | 21.2–29.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 14.8% | 12.1–17.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 10.9% | 9.2–12.7 |
| Loneliness among adults | 34.6% | 28.4–41.2 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 13.4% | 11.2–15.7 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 15.5% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 2.7% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 9.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 11.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 13.4% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 14.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 4.6% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668 |
| Households without a vehicle | 10.8% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694 |
| Broadband subscription | 92.3% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 85.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 15.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 16.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694 |
| Homeownership rate | 81.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 84.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.4% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696 |
| Single-parent households | 67.2% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 57.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686 |
| Population 65+ | 34.4% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696 |
| Median age | 57.1 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 45.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681 |
| Median household income | $49,167 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539 |
| Median home value | $99,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553 |
| Median gross rent | $983 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $802 ($586–$1,085) n=293 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 79.1 yr ± 2.38 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 76.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.38 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured