Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

25067

in East Bank, West VirginiaPopulation 850

27.40/ 100

Ranked #31,183 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.8%)

Ranked #567 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #72 of 83 Charleston, WV ZIPs (bottom 13.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

80.7%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

22%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

22.3%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.8%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US4th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.8%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.4%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.2%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

42.7%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, East Bank, West Virginia (ZIP 25067) stands in the bottom 2.8% nationally (31,183rd) and the bottom 19% of West Virginia (567th).

continue reading

The weightiest signals in the profile are worth naming up front: modeled pfas stands in the top 1.8% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability resides in the top 3.4% nationally, and independent living disability stands in the top 4.5% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure sits in the top 4.8% nationally, high cholesterol resides in the top 3.7% nationally, and mobility disability stands in the top 6.4% nationally. Floodplain exposure sits in the top 5.6% nationally. More positively, modeled expected annual loss resides in the bottom 2.6% nationally, and disaster risk stands in the bottom 4.1% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 25015, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Charleston, WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 1%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 1%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults40.6%37.3–43.7
High blood pressure among adults48.8%44.9–52.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%8.9–11.1
Current asthma among adults12.8%11.2–14.4
Coronary heart disease among adults10.1%8.8–11.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.4%11.3–15.8
Depression among adults33.0%29.3–36.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.9%15.5–20.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.4%41.6–49.0
Obesity among adults42.8%37.6–48.0
Stroke among adults5.0%4.3–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.0%21.4–29.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.5%7.3–12.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.3–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%77.7–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.2–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.2%62.5–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.9%47.5–54.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.3%66.3–78.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.9%11.4–16.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults24.8%21.0–28.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.1%33.2–43.0
Short sleep duration among adults41.7%37.6–45.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.8%25.7–34.1
Frequent mental distress among adults23.8%21.2–26.5
Frequent physical distress among adults20.0%17.4–22.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.3%19.5–25.2
Any disability among adults45.8%41.1–50.4
Hearing disability among adults10.1%8.8–11.5
Independent living disability among adults13.8%11.9–16.0
Mobility disability among adults23.2%19.9–26.6
Self-care disability among adults5.8%5.0–6.9
Vision disability among adults7.2%6.1–8.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.5%21.9–29.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.2%18.0–26.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.2%19.9–29.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.3%12.8–18.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.1–12.6
Loneliness among adults35.6%31.4–39.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.0%11.9–16.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–645.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)10.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)1.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle3.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription88.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate74.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households54.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+21.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age43.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$72,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$98,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$908$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.7 yr ± 1.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.68 years of 79.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured