Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

26181

in Washington, West VirginiaPopulation 6,167

47.92/ 100

Ranked #19,025 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #28 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (top 4.1%)

Ranked #1 of 13 Parkersburg-Vienna, WV ZIPs (top 7.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

74.1%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.6%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.9%

in the bottom 11.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US12th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

79.9%

in the top 11.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

57.3%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

19.8%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

4.4 mi

in the bottom 20% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.6%

in the bottom 10.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

10.3%

in the bottom 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

8.6%

in the bottom 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US24th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Washington, West Virginia (ZIP 26181), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 41% nationally (19,025th) and the top 4.1% of West Virginia (28th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: modeled colon screening resides in the top 4.6% nationally, energy burden lies in the bottom 11.8% nationally, and mammography settles in the top 11.7% nationally. Housing-cost burden stands in the bottom 15.0% nationally. Working the other way, modeled high cholesterol is in the top 8.2% nationally, and pfas rests in the top 13.4% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 14.2% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water registers in the top 15% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled high blood pressure resides in the top 14.9% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 45742, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Parkersburg-Vienna, WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.9%35.4–42.2
High blood pressure among adults44.2%40.3–47.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.2%10.2–12.3
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.1–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.8–10.0
Depression among adults30.4%26.6–34.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.1%13.2–17.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.6%39.5–47.6
Obesity among adults40.7%34.9–46.4
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.8%11.3–16.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.6%4.6–6.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.1%78.4–83.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.4%80.6–86.1
Cholesterol screening among adults90.3%88.9–91.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.1%69.9–77.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.8%60.4–67.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.9%73.9–85.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.3–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.8%12.7–17.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.7%23.8–31.7
Short sleep duration among adults38.9%33.8–44.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.7%18.1–23.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.4–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.7–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.1%13.2–16.9
Any disability among adults34.1%30.2–38.1
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.3
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.5
Mobility disability among adults16.1%14.1–18.2
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.6%16.8–22.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.6–12.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.9–12.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.2–10.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Loneliness among adults30.7%26.6–35.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.4–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–643.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)2.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle3.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription86.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate89.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households62.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+27.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age49.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$73,977$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$197,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$890$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 1.0378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.03 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured