Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

23878

in Sedley, VirginiaPopulation 1,217

51.38/ 100

Ranked #14,318 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #408 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

6.1%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

99.2 days/year

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US77th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

Sedley, Virginia (ZIP 23878) ranks in the top 45% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,318th) and the top 47% of Virginia (408th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled pfas rests in the bottom 2.2% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Poverty settles in the bottom 11.1% nationally, modeled arsenic rests in the bottom 11.3% nationally, and homeownership lands in the top 11.9% nationally. Crowded housing settles at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the bottom 18% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure lands at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Modeled radon settles in the bottom 21% nationally. On the other side, recreation rests at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

For context, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 23487, about 7.1 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 94.1 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 38.8 — 55 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,096 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.5%28.1–35.2
High blood pressure among adults40.1%35.7–44.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.1–9.9
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%7.0–9.2
Depression among adults23.3%19.8–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.3%12.4–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.8%36.2–45.4
Obesity among adults36.1%28.3–44.5
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.3%9.3–13.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.5%7.0–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%76.7–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%76.2–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.4%85.5–89.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.4%64.7–73.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.1%60.6–67.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.8%70.5–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%11.9–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%12.8–17.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.8%21.5–30.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.0%31.4–44.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.7%17.9–23.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.2–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.2–16.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%13.8–17.8
Any disability among adults34.8%30.3–39.5
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.9–8.7
Independent living disability among adults8.9%7.9–10.1
Mobility disability among adults16.7%14.5–19.0
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%19.0–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.3%11.0–15.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.1–13.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%8.9–12.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Loneliness among adults33.8%28.3–39.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.8–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)8.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)6.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription86.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate92.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households38.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+33.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age46.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$87,077$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$219,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.1 yr ± 1.0478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.04 years of 77.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured