Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

21225

in Brooklyn, MarylandPopulation 34,062

39.24/ 100

Ranked #27,244 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranked #453 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (bottom 1.1%)

Ranked #153 of 157 Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD ZIPs (bottom 2.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

822 units

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

190 intersections/sq mi

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

40.8%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

21.9%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

25%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

5.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

17.1%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

30.9%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

15.4%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Brooklyn, Maryland (ZIP 21225) lands in the bottom 15% nationally (27,244th) and the bottom 1.1% of Maryland (453rd).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 2.1% nationally, and walkability resides in the top 2.8% nationally. Transit registers in the top 4.5% nationally. On the other side, modeled loneliness rests in the top 3.0% nationally, modeled short sleep stands in the top 4.5% nationally, and households without a vehicle lies in the top 3.9% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lands in the top 4.1% nationally, utility shutoff sits in the top 4.5% nationally, and food insecurity is in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled transportation settles in the top 5.8% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 21060, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 70.3 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $54,020 predicts 77.6 years — 7.4 years below.

    Ranked #5,820 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 70.3 ± 1.2 years. The 43 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.8 years — 6.5 years below them.

    Ranked #3,607 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.4%24.8–28.0
High blood pressure among adults39.3%37.2–41.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.2%5.8–6.6
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.7–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%6.2–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%8.2–9.7
Depression among adults24.0%22.0–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%13.4–15.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.6%33.6–37.7
Obesity among adults41.2%38.0–44.4
Stroke among adults4.4%4.1–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.4%17.3–21.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.5%13.1–15.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.6%71.8–75.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.0%76.0–79.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%83.6–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.3%59.5–65.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.0%46.8–51.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.2%74.4–81.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.3%13.7–16.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.0%18.2–21.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.2%29.7–34.7
Short sleep duration among adults44.0%41.2–47.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.8%25.9–29.8
Frequent mental distress among adults20.4%18.9–21.9
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%15.2–17.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.4%17.9–20.9
Any disability among adults37.3%34.9–39.8
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.5–6.5
Independent living disability among adults11.9%10.9–12.8
Mobility disability among adults18.2%16.9–19.6
Self-care disability among adults6.1%5.7–6.5
Vision disability among adults8.1%7.5–8.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.7%27.5–32.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults30.9%28.9–33.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults29.6%27.7–31.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.0%23.2–27.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.4%14.2–16.9
Loneliness among adults40.8%38.2–44.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults17.1%15.7–18.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–6413.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)20.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)7.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle21.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription83.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate49.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population14.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households27.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+11.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age34.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$54,020$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$229,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$1,148$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth70.3 yr ± 0.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.62 years of 70.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured