Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

21075

in Elkridge, MarylandPopulation 37,363

65.31/ 100

Ranked #1,884 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.9%)

Ranked #80 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #38 of 157 Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

44.4 per million

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

3.9%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.6%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$135,303

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST72nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

7.9%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.1%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Park land

22.5%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

11.7%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.4%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Elkridge, Maryland (ZIP 21075) ranks in the top 5.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,884th) and the top 17% of Maryland (80th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled hearing disability resides in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Household income rests in the top 5.9% nationally, and modeled mobility disability stands in the bottom 3.0% nationally. Modeled stroke lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally, park land lands in the top 6.2% nationally, and modeled energy burden sits in the bottom 3.5% nationally. On the other side, modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the top 1.5% nationally, industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 4.3% nationally, and transportation noise resides in the top 6.7% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Close by, ZIP 21043, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 1%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.2 ± 1.5 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.3 years — 2.8 years above them.

    Ranked #942 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 8.6 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 94.7 (top 10%) — 86 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,627 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 44.4 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 81.2 ± 1.5 years.

    Ranked #303 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.2%18.3–22.2
High blood pressure among adults30.0%27.4–32.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.6–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.6%3.2–4.1
Depression among adults19.3%17.0–21.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.9%7.8–10.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.2%32.3–38.2
Obesity among adults31.4%27.4–35.6
Stroke among adults2.1%1.9–2.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.7%5.4–8.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%6.2–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.5%66.5–72.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.9%75.0–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.9–90.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.4%59.3–67.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.0%64.1–69.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.8%76.5–86.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.7–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.6%7.4–10.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.9%14.5–19.4
Short sleep duration among adults39.8%35.7–44.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.9%11.4–14.5
Frequent mental distress among adults14.3%12.8–16.0
Frequent physical distress among adults9.5%8.4–10.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.7%9.5–12.0
Any disability among adults20.6%18.2–23.2
Hearing disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.3
Independent living disability among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Mobility disability among adults7.9%6.9–9.0
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.1–2.6
Vision disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.4%20.5–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.4–14.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.2–9.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.8–13.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.9–7.6
Loneliness among adults32.8%29.0–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.9–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–644.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)5.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)59.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle3.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription97.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate64.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population24.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households41.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+8.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age34.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$135,303$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$455,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$2,183$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.1 yr ± 0.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.78 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured