Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

19956

in Laurel, DelawarePopulation 16,327

46.66/ 100

Ranked #20,560 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #53 of 64 Delaware ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Nitrate in drinking water

11.0%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.8%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

4.8%

in the top 14.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

19.2%

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US80th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

85.4%

in the bottom 32% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US32nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Laurel, Delaware (ZIP 19956) lands in the bottom 36% nationally (20,560th) and the bottom 17% of Delaware (53rd).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: mental-health providers registers in the top 17% nationally, and modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 17% nationally. Transit rests in the top 18% nationally, and pharmacy is in the top 19% nationally. On the other hand, modeled nitrate stands in the top 3.0% nationally, modeled high cholesterol settles in the top 7.5% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lies in the bottom 11.7% nationally. Modeled pfas resides in the top 14.3% nationally, crowded housing lands in the top 14.5% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 18% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 19940, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 79.4; chronic-disease standing 28.7 — 51 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,440 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.8%27.0–32.8
High blood pressure among adults39.8%36.3–43.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.9–9.4
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.4–10.6
Depression among adults23.0%19.8–26.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.4%11.9–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.8%40.0–47.5
Obesity among adults37.1%31.2–43.1
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.2%16.3–22.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.9%10.2–13.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%76.2–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%76.9–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%83.2–87.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.1%58.9–67.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.4%49.8–57.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.6%71.0–82.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.3–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.6%16.3–21.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.2%27.1–35.5
Short sleep duration among adults36.4%31.8–41.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.1%20.5–25.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.7–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%14.2–17.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.0%14.2–17.9
Any disability among adults34.1%30.3–37.9
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Independent living disability among adults10.1%9.0–11.2
Mobility disability among adults16.7%14.8–18.6
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.3
Vision disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%19.8–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.9%16.7–21.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.0%14.7–19.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.0%12.3–15.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Loneliness among adults32.8%29.2–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.4–10.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)DE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.2% (2.4–16.7%) n=62
Uninsured 18–646.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (3.2–18.9%) n=63
No HS diploma (25+)12.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.1% (3.2–15.9%) n=63
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.1% (13.0–59.9%) n=63
Unemployment rate (16+)5.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.9–8.9%) n=63
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.1%) n=62
Broadband subscription85.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.8% (85.5–97.0%) n=62
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (17.0–38.0%) n=62
Homeownership rate67.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.6% (59.5–92.0%) n=62
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.8%) n=62
Foreign-born population8.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.1% (1.1–16.0%) n=64
Single-parent households50.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.4% (43.2–77.6%) n=62
Population 65+17.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (13.0–42.2%) n=64
Median age37.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (34.9–62.0) n=64
Median household income$65,603$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,604 ($60,703–$125,491) n=61
Median home value$259,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$322,500 ($243,800–$534,600) n=61
Median gross rent$1,041$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,370 ($1,106–$1,655) n=55
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)DE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 0.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (75.5–81.2) n=61

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.69 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured