Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

19964

in Marydel, DelawarePopulation 1,418

42.59/ 100

Ranked #24,742 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #61 of 64 Delaware ZIPs (bottom 4.7%)

Ranked #15 of 16 Dover, DE ZIPs (bottom 6.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

24.6%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

68.6%

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

6.2%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68.9%

in the bottom 10.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

9 mi

in the top 13.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

9.7 mi

in the top 14.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US18th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

19.1%

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US78th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

61.3%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

Marydel, Delaware (ZIP 19964), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 23% nationally (24,742nd) and the bottom 4.7% of Delaware (61st).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: fatal road crashes resides at the national minimum, and housing-cost burden lies in the bottom 5.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Crowded housing stands at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is in the top 14.7% nationally. Working the other way, households without a vehicle rests in the top 3.3% nationally, and home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 5.5% nationally. Modeled mammography registers in the bottom 10.1% nationally, and distance to a nursing home lands in the top 13.5% nationally. Modeled obesity resides in the top 11.7% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 19934, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Dover, DE metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 75.7; chronic-disease standing 18.3 — 57 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,921 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.5%29.3–35.8
High blood pressure among adults39.8%36.1–43.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.0–10.9
Current asthma among adults12.8%11.3–14.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%6.9–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.5–11.4
Depression among adults25.1%21.6–28.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.3%12.6–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.3%38.4–46.4
Obesity among adults42.3%35.9–49.0
Stroke among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.9%15.7–22.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.7%9.6–14.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%75.3–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.7%77.4–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.5–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.3%56.5–65.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.8%53.9–61.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.9%61.5–75.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.4%11.2–15.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.8%14.0–19.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.7%29.9–39.6
Short sleep duration among adults38.8%33.5–44.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.0%20.8–27.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%16.8–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%15.2–19.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.9%14.6–19.1
Any disability among adults39.1%34.9–43.6
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.5
Independent living disability among adults10.2%8.8–11.6
Mobility disability among adults19.1%16.7–21.8
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.2
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.0%19.9–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.2%12.8–18.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.2%10.7–15.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.6–14.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.0–9.3
Loneliness among adults35.5%31.6–39.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.1–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)DE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.2% (2.4–16.7%) n=62
Uninsured 18–6426.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (3.2–18.9%) n=63
No HS diploma (25+)32.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.1% (3.2–15.9%) n=63
Bachelor's or higher (25+)5.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.1% (13.0–59.9%) n=63
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.9–8.9%) n=63
Households without a vehicle24.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.1%) n=62
Broadband subscription68.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.8% (85.5–97.0%) n=62
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)6.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (17.0–38.0%) n=62
Homeownership rate87.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.6% (59.5–92.0%) n=62
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.8%) n=62
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.1% (1.1–16.0%) n=64
Single-parent households43.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.4% (43.2–77.6%) n=62
Population 65+9.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (13.0–42.2%) n=64
Median age40.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (34.9–62.0) n=64
Median household income$99,402$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,604 ($60,703–$125,491) n=61
Median home value$329,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$322,500 ($243,800–$534,600) n=61
Median gross rent$1,094$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,370 ($1,106–$1,655) n=55
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)DE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.5 yr ± 1.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (75.5–81.2) n=61

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 74.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured