Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

19973

in Seaford, DelawarePopulation 26,834

46.11/ 100

Ranked #21,227 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #55 of 64 Delaware ZIPs (bottom 14.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

11.8%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

308 units

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 13.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

4.8%

in the top 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.9 pCi/L

in the bottom 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US15th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

4.7%

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US79th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

16.7%

in the top 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US74th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

5.2%

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US78th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Seaford, Delaware (ZIP 19973) ranks in the bottom 34% nationally (21,227th) and the bottom 14.1% of Delaware (55th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing is in the top 8.0% nationally. Distance to a community health center settles at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Physicians resides in the top 12.6% nationally. Distance to a nursing home registers at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Set against that, distance to a Superfund site rests at the national minimum, modeled nitrate stands in the top 2.9% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol lies in the top 4.4% nationally. Unemployment lands in the top 12.3% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss sits in the top 13.1% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Close by, ZIP 19933, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.2 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $64,387 predicts 78.3 years — 2.1 years below.

    Ranked #2,822 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.6%28.7–34.5
High blood pressure among adults42.6%39.0–46.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.3–9.8
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.3–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.9–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.9–11.0
Depression among adults21.8%18.8–24.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.0%13.3–16.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.0%41.2–48.7
Obesity among adults37.8%31.9–43.7
Stroke among adults4.7%4.4–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.2%14.6–20.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.3%10.7–14.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%78.2–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.5%78.4–84.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.6–88.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.8%61.8–70.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.6%52.1–59.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.5%72.1–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.4%11.3–15.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.0%15.8–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.6%28.5–36.9
Short sleep duration among adults36.2%31.7–41.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.2%21.8–26.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%15.1–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults16.3%14.7–18.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%13.9–17.3
Any disability among adults35.3%31.7–39.0
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Independent living disability among adults10.4%9.4–11.5
Mobility disability among adults18.3%16.4–20.3
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.8–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.8%6.2–7.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.1%20.3–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.9%17.7–22.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.9%15.7–20.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.9–16.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.9–11.1
Loneliness among adults32.6%29.1–36.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.8–11.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)DE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.2% (2.4–16.7%) n=62
Uninsured 18–6412.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (3.2–18.9%) n=63
No HS diploma (25+)14.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.1% (3.2–15.9%) n=63
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.1% (13.0–59.9%) n=63
Unemployment rate (16+)8.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.9–8.9%) n=63
Households without a vehicle5.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.1%) n=62
Broadband subscription89.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.8% (85.5–97.0%) n=62
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (17.0–38.0%) n=62
Homeownership rate72.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.6% (59.5–92.0%) n=62
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.8%) n=62
Foreign-born population7.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.1% (1.1–16.0%) n=64
Single-parent households48.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.4% (43.2–77.6%) n=62
Population 65+20.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (13.0–42.2%) n=64
Median age41.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (34.9–62.0) n=64
Median household income$64,387$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,604 ($60,703–$125,491) n=61
Median home value$278,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$322,500 ($243,800–$534,600) n=61
Median gross rent$1,135$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,370 ($1,106–$1,655) n=55
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)DE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 0.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (75.5–81.2) n=61

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.56 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured