ZIP code
14856
in Kanona, New YorkPopulation 0
42.52/ 100
Ranked #24,803 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)
Ranked #1,682 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 2.8%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 2.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS2ndDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Industrial-pollution burden
in the bottom 9.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Mammography
68.8%
in the bottom 9.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS10thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
20.9%
in the top 13.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS86thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
6.0%
in the top 12.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS88thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
11.7%
in the top 13.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS87thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Stroke
5.0%
in the top 14.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS86thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
42.2%
in the top 14.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS85thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
9.1%
in the top 19% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS81stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›The read
In its overall standing, Kanona, New York (ZIP 14856) lands in the bottom 23% nationally (24,803rd) and the bottom 2.8% of New York (1,682nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.
This area's pressures are easy to read across the measures: modeled mammography settles in the bottom 9.7% nationally, mobility disability is in the top 13.6% nationally, and self-care disability sits in the top 12.2% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lands in the top 13.2% nationally, stroke lies in the top 14.5% nationally, and short sleep stands in the top 16% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and expected annual loss registers in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 9.3% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.
Put simply, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. On the overall standing, ZIP 14810, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 91%
14%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 94%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 52%
13%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 49%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 11%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 24%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 16%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 23%
8%
Disability
healthier than 19%
7%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 96%
14%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 93%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.8%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 21%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 17%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 10%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 2%
8%
Disability
healthier than 4%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 38%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
14810
New Yorkshares a border
Score 47.28
Closest healthier
14809
New Yorkless than 0.1 mi away
Score 50.19
Similar health profile
15730
Pennsylvania99% similar profile
Score 45.37
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 37.2% | 33.2–41.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 40.2% | 35.8–44.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.4% | 9.2–11.6 |
| Current asthma among adults | 13.1% | 11.4–14.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.1% | 7.7–10.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 12.3% | 9.7–15.4 |
| Depression among adults | 24.7% | 21.2–28.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 14.8% | 12.4–17.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 42.2% | 37.6–46.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.4% | 31.3–46.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.0% | 4.1–6.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 19.1% | 15.7–22.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 5.8% | 3.9–8.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 81.9% | 78.8–84.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 82.7% | 79.5–85.5 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 88.5% | 86.1–90.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 63.9% | 58.6–68.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 53.4% | 49.7–56.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 68.8% | 60.3–75.9 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 14.6% | 12.0–17.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 18.9% | 14.2–23.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 32.2% | 25.4–39.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 40.2% | 34.0–45.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 23.8% | 19.0–29.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 19.0% | 16.2–22.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 18.5% | 15.4–21.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.7% | 13.4–20.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 36.2% | 30.0–42.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.9% | 6.8–9.1 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.7% | 9.3–14.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 20.9% | 16.9–25.8 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.0% | 4.7–7.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.8% | 5.5–8.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.8% | 19.6–28.1 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 18.9% | 13.5–24.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 19.9% | 14.1–25.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.7% | 10.2–17.0 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 9.8% | 7.6–12.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 32.4% | 27.4–37.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 9.0% | 7.1–10.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | — | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | — | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 5.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | — | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | — | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | — | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730 |
| Households without a vehicle | — | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 5.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730 |
| Broadband subscription | — | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 91.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | — | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 27.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | — | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730 |
| Foreign-born population | — | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 4.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 54.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716 |
| Population 65+ | — | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746 |
| Median age | — | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 78.3 yr ± 1.75 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.75 years of 78.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured