Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

44417

in Farmdale, OhioPopulation 1,550

39.42/ 100

Ranked #27,127 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranked #984 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #35 of 50 Youngstown-Warren, OH ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

0.65 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

27.4%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.1%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.4 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.02%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

17.6%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.3%

in the top 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

10.3%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

42%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Farmdale, Ohio (ZIP 44417) sits in the bottom 15% nationally (27,127th) and the bottom 16% of Ohio (984th).

continue reading

The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: modeled arsenic rests in the top 3.8% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease settles in the top 3.9% nationally, and walkability lands in the bottom 4.2% nationally. Modeled diabetes rests in the top 9.4% nationally, and stroke settles in the top 10.1% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Better still, elder services rests in the top 1.7% nationally, and floodplain exposure settles in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lands in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Crowded housing rests at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 44410, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Youngstown-Warren, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.3%34.8–41.6
High blood pressure among adults43.5%39.5–47.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.5–11.6
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults11.1%9.7–12.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.9%11.0–15.0
Depression among adults26.0%22.4–29.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.6%15.4–20.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.0%37.8–45.8
Obesity among adults40.7%34.6–46.5
Stroke among adults5.3%4.6–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.0%14.3–20.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.7%7.6–12.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.6%80.0–84.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%76.9–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%82.8–87.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.1%63.7–72.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.1%55.8–62.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.3%62.6–77.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.0–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.1%18.3–25.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.6%29.3–40.0
Short sleep duration among adults39.0%34.3–44.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.5%21.4–29.6
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%16.6–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults18.0%15.5–20.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.6%14.1–19.1
Any disability among adults36.4%31.4–41.2
Hearing disability among adults10.3%9.0–11.6
Independent living disability among adults10.8%9.1–12.4
Mobility disability among adults19.6%16.7–22.7
Self-care disability among adults5.6%4.7–6.5
Vision disability among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%19.0–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.7%14.3–21.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.4%13.3–19.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.0–14.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.6–10.4
Loneliness among adults33.0%28.2–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.7–10.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6415.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)9.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)1.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle7.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription86.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate83.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households64.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+32.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age45.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$52,763$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$197,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$909$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.7 yr ± 1.3878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.38 years of 77.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured