Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14809

in Avoca, New YorkPopulation 2,890

50.19/ 100

Ranked #15,971 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranked #1,422 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Crowded housing

10.4%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

25.4%

in the top 10.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

75.6%

in the bottom 10.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.6 pCi/L

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

27.3 mi

in the top 32% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US68th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Avoca, New York (ZIP 14809) lands in the top 50% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,971st) and the bottom 18% of New York (1,422nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that set this area apart are worth putting up front: modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 9.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Childcare settles in the top 13.6% nationally, modeled humid heat resides in the bottom 17% nationally, and modeled disaster risk registers in the bottom 18% nationally. Set against that, crowded housing rests in the top 4.3% nationally, poverty stands in the top 10.5% nationally, and home broadband subscription lies in the bottom 10.7% nationally. Households without a vehicle lands in the top 10.8% nationally, and modeled radon sits in the top 18% nationally.

A note on the terms: industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 14823, about 0.5 miles away, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.9%29.5–36.4
High blood pressure among adults37.5%33.4–41.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.5–11.6
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.1–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.2–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.8–10.3
Depression among adults21.8%18.7–25.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%10.6–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%35.5–44.2
Obesity among adults35.6%28.8–43.0
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.8%11.4–16.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%5.1–7.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.9%77.1–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%78.2–84.3
Cholesterol screening among adults89.1%87.5–90.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.8%61.1–69.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.0%55.5–62.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.4%68.4–81.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%14.1–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.6%13.2–18.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.5%23.0–32.4
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%32.1–43.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.1%16.5–22.1
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.7–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%13.3–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%12.1–15.8
Any disability among adults31.7%27.6–36.2
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.6
Independent living disability among adults9.0%7.9–10.2
Mobility disability among adults16.4%14.2–18.9
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.6%20.2–27.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.0%11.7–16.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.7%11.4–16.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%9.9–13.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.7–8.9
Loneliness among adults31.0%26.2–36.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.4–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate25.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6412.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)13.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle12.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription75.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate77.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)10.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households52.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+16.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age33.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$63,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$107,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$898$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.0 yr ± 1.2878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.28 years of 81.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured