ZIP code
14802
in Alfred, New YorkPopulation 4,814
60.08/ 100
Ranked #4,799 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 15.0%)
Ranked #600 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 35%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
High cholesterol
16.7%
in the bottom 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
13.4%
in the bottom 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
24.8%
in the top 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
2.6%
in the bottom 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
1.6%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Stroke
0.90%
in the bottom 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
2.5%
in the bottom 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
3.9%
in the bottom 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
43.5%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
80.7%
in the top 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›The read
Alfred, New York (ZIP 14802), in overall standing, comes out in the top 15.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,799th) and the top 35% of New York (600th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled high cholesterol settles in the bottom 0.8% nationally, fatal road crashes lands at the national minimum, and modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Modeled obesity settles in the bottom 5.1% nationally. Against that, modeled binge drinking lands in the top 0.6% nationally, and loneliness rests in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled pfas settles in the top 1.8% nationally, and unemployment lands in the top 3.1% nationally. Slow internet speeds rests in the top 3.2% nationally, and poverty settles in the top 3.7% nationally.
Set within its surrounding area, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Locally, no neighbor ranks healthier overall than this ZIP. Beyond that, the ZIP also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.8%
21%
Disability
healthier than 94%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 98%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 57%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 59%
11%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 18%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 9%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 14%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 21%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 99%
21%
Disability
healthier than 87%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
in the top 0.04%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 51%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 48%
11%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 17%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 2%
13%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.9%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 19%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
14803
New Yorkshares a border
Score 52.92
Similar health profile
12222
New York99% similar profile
Score 63.13
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 7.0% | 6.0–8.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 13.4% | 11.2–15.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 1.9% | 1.7–2.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.1% | 9.6–12.7 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 1.6% | 1.4–1.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 2.3% | 1.8–2.9 |
| Depression among adults | 22.6% | 18.8–26.7 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 2.6% | 2.2–3.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 16.7% | 14.1–19.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 24.7% | 18.6–31.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 0.9% | 0.8–1.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 14.1% | 11.4–17.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.2% | 4.2–9.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 39.5% | 37.1–42.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 71.5% | 66.6–76.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 73.0% | 67.0–78.3 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 69.5% | 64.7–74.0 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 58.5% | 54.9–62.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 76.5% | 68.9–83.1 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 24.8% | 20.7–29.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 6.5% | 4.5–9.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 16.3% | 12.2–21.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.8% | 29.2–42.5 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 11.3% | 8.7–15.1 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 22.2% | 18.0–26.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 8.0% | 6.4–9.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.7% | 13.3–22.5 |
| Any disability among adults | 24.5% | 18.9–30.8 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 2.5% | 2.1–3.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.8% | 5.9–10.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 3.9% | 3.2–4.8 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 1.4% | 1.2–1.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.3% | 2.7–4.3 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 26.2% | 20.8–31.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 14.6% | 10.2–19.7 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 9.7% | 6.7–13.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.7% | 8.5–14.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 11.0% | 8.1–13.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 43.5% | 36.7–50.4 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 6.2% | 4.7–7.6 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 37.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 3.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 5.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 2.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 71.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 16.5% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730 |
| Households without a vehicle | 11.1% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 5.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730 |
| Broadband subscription | 91.3% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 91.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 35.3% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 27.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730 |
| Homeownership rate | 48.5% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.7% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730 |
| Foreign-born population | 8.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 4.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746 |
| Single-parent households | 58.1% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 54.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716 |
| Population 65+ | 3.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746 |
| Median age | 20.2 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733 |
| Median household income | $40,489 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626 |
| Median home value | $170,800 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629 |
| Median gross rent | $895 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 87.9 yr ± 2.55 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.55 years of 87.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured