Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14132

in Sanborn, New YorkPopulation 6,453

59.41/ 100

Ranked #5,277 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #655 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #33 of 86 Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.9%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Sanborn, New York (ZIP 14132), by its overall standing, sits in the top 16% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,277th) and the top 38% of New York (655th).

continue reading

Several readings land clearly in this area's favor and shape the picture: mental-health providers stands in the top 5.9% nationally, grocery lands in the top 10.2% nationally, and home broadband subscription is in the top 13.6% nationally. Transit resides in the top 13.8% nationally. Crowded housing rests at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled uninsured lies in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and cognitive disability sits in the bottom 17% nationally. Set against that, fiber broadband settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site registers in the bottom 14.9% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 14092, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.9 ± 1.6 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.8 years — 3.1 years above them.

    Ranked #749 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.0%24.2–30.2
High blood pressure among adults34.1%30.5–38.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.9–10.8
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.8–7.5
Depression among adults21.0%18.1–24.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.9%8.6–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.9%31.2–39.0
Obesity among adults37.0%31.0–44.0
Stroke among adults3.2%3.0–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.4%9.4–13.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.9%4.1–5.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.1%74.4–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.1%79.2–85.0
Cholesterol screening among adults89.4%88.0–90.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%66.0–74.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.6%65.4–71.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.0%71.5–84.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.7–20.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.2%10.5–14.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.3%19.7–27.3
Short sleep duration among adults35.9%30.6–41.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.7%13.7–18.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.2–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.7–14.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.9%10.6–13.6
Any disability among adults26.1%22.8–30.0
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.2
Mobility disability among adults12.5%11.0–14.4
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.7–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.4%19.1–25.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.2–13.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.9–11.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.5–11.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.8–7.6
Loneliness among adults30.3%25.7–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–643.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)9.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)5.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription96.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate86.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population5.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households52.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+14.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age43.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$97,210$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$284,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$946$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured