ZIP code

13102

in Mc Lean, New YorkPopulation 36

ZipVitals Score

How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

56.79/ 100

Ranked #7,474 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #878 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #9 of 12 Ithaca, NY ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

Jump to a section

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st

US1st

Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st

US1st

Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th

US2nd

Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st

US1st

Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th

US99th

Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th

US99th

Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.4%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST76th

US91st

Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.8%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd

US5th

Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

32.4%

in the bottom 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th

US23rd

Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Mc Lean, New York (ZIP 13102) stands in the top 23% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,474th) and the bottom 49% of New York (878th).

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled expected annual loss registers in the bottom 1.3% nationally, and housing-cost burden lies at the national minimum. Modeled disaster risk is in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and poverty registers at the national minimum. Homeownership lies at the national maximum, and home broadband subscription is at the national maximum. Unemployment registers at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. On the other side, fiber broadband registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Set beside the wider area around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. ZIP 13068, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Ithaca, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare withinUnited StatesNew YorkMetro area

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of the United States

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Disability

healthier than 63%

About typical

close to the middle of the United States

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of the United States

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of New York

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of New York

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of this metro area

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of this metro area

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

Disability

healthier than 20%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Arthritis among adults	33.0%	29.4–36.6
High blood pressure among adults	36.2%	32.3–40.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults	11.9%	10.6–13.3
Current asthma among adults	12.2%	10.7–13.7
Coronary heart disease among adults	7.6%	6.2–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults	8.2%	6.0–10.8
Depression among adults	24.6%	21.2–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults	11.3%	9.3–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened	38.2%	34.5–42.0
Obesity among adults	28.8%	23.6–34.6
Stroke among adults	3.8%	3.1–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years	9.5%	7.7–11.6

PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years	4.8%	3.1–7.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure	79.8%	76.9–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults	81.2%	78.0–84.0
Cholesterol screening among adults	91.0%	88.9–92.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years	72.4%	68.1–76.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults	68.5%	65.4–71.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years	79.7%	73.3–85.1

Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Binge drinking among adults	14.6%	12.2–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults	12.7%	8.8–16.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults	22.7%	17.4–28.2
Short sleep duration among adults	32.4%	27.6–37.5

Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults	17.7%	13.7–22.7
Frequent mental distress among adults	16.4%	13.8–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults	14.5%	11.8–17.4

DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults	12.7%	10.2–15.7
Any disability among adults	29.1%	23.8–34.9
Hearing disability among adults	7.1%	5.9–8.3
Independent living disability among adults	8.4%	6.5–10.5
Mobility disability among adults	14.7%	11.2–18.4
Self-care disability among adults	3.8%	2.9–4.9
Vision disability among adults	4.6%	3.6–5.8

Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults	21.7%	17.4–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults	12.0%	8.3–16.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults	11.4%	7.8–16.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults	10.2%	7.5–13.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults	7.0%	5.5–8.9
Loneliness among adults	32.4%	27.3–37.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults	6.3%	4.8–7.8

Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed

Measure	Value	US median (p10–p90)	NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate	0.0%	10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364	9.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–64	0.0%	9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286	5.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)	0.0%	7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505	7.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)	25.0%	23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505	31.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)	0.0%	3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274	4.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle	0.0%	3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322	5.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription	100.0%	89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322	91.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)	0.0%	23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322	27.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate	100.0%	78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322	80.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)	0.0%	1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322	1.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population	0.0%	2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553	4.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households	100.0%	53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087	54.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+	44.4%	19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553	20.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age	35.8 yr	42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292	43.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income	—	$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318	$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value	—	$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049	$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent	—	$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670	$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367

Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based

Measure	Value	US median (p10–p90)	NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth	81.5 yr ± 2.33	78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308	80.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.33 years of 81.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

Statistically similar ZIPs nationally

Similar means a ZIP whose health profile is shaped like this one’s — the same pattern of strengths and weaknesses across the nine health domains behind the Score, not similar demographics or income. The percentage is how closely the two patterns line up. A very similar ZIP can still have a different overall Score.

27572North Carolina98% similar
Score 55.84View 27572 Compare this ZIP with 27572
27541North Carolina98% similar
Score 56.10View 27541 Compare this ZIP with 27541
27050North Carolina98% similar
Score 55.33View 27050 Compare this ZIP with 27050
27283North Carolina97% similar
Score 54.54View 27283 Compare this ZIP with 27283
48821Michigan97% similar
Score 57.10View 48821 Compare this ZIP with 48821
27249North Carolina97% similar
Score 56.55View 27249 Compare this ZIP with 27249
49640Michigan97% similar
Score 56.98View 49640 Compare this ZIP with 49640
04086Maine97% similar
Score 55.98View 04086 Compare this ZIP with 04086
04046Maine96% similar
Score 57.53View 04046 Compare this ZIP with 04046
22952Virginia96% similar
Score 56.07View 22952 Compare this ZIP with 22952

as of 2026

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured