ZIP code
13062
in Etna, New YorkPopulation 195
63.80/ 100
Ranked #2,573 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 8.1%)
Ranked #343 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 20%)
Ranked #4 of 12 Ithaca, NY ZIPs (top 33%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
PFAS in drinking water
81%
in the top 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 2.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Mammography
83.2%
in the top 2.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 5.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS6thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
4.7%
in the bottom 4.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Industrial-pollution burden
in the bottom 6.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Obesity
26.7%
in the bottom 8.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST15thUS8thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
10.1%
in the bottom 5.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST18thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
12.8%
in the bottom 5.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST11thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›The read
Etna, New York (ZIP 13062), on the composite measure, lands in the top 8.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,573rd) and the top 20% of New York (343rd).
Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 2.6% nationally, home broadband subscription lies at the national maximum, and modeled mammography settles in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss stands in the bottom 5.6% nationally, hearing disability is in the bottom 4.5% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden rests in the bottom 6.3% nationally. Modeled obesity sits in the bottom 8.5% nationally. Unemployment registers at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled cognitive disability lands in the bottom 5.4% nationally. On the other hand, modeled pfas resides in the top 1.7% nationally.
Set against the neighboring ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 14850, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Ithaca, NY metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 87%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 83%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 89%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 87%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 70%
8%
Disability
healthier than 94%
7%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 50%
14%
Holding it back
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 37%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 18%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 79%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 80%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 89%
11%
Disability
healthier than 86%
7%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 41%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 60%
13%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 28%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 10%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 17%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 70%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 90%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 60%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the top 0.00%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 80%
8%
Disability
healthier than 90%
7%
About typical
Healthcare Access
healthier than 40%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 10%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
13068
New Yorkshares a border
Score 58.49
Closest healthier
14850
New Yorkshares a border
Score 65.39
Similar health profile
23120
Virginia99% similar profile
Score 65.86
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 25.2% | 22.3–28.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 28.8% | 25.4–32.5 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.3% | 8.2–10.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.8% | 9.6–12.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 4.8% | 4.1–5.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.2% | 3.9–7.3 |
| Depression among adults | 23.1% | 19.8–26.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 8.3% | 6.9–9.9 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 32.9% | 29.5–36.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 26.7% | 21.8–32.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.6% | 2.1–3.2 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 10.6% | 8.6–12.9 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 4.1% | 3.0–6.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 74.2% | 71.0–77.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 78.4% | 75.1–81.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 89.8% | 87.7–91.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 73.0% | 68.9–76.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 65.8% | 62.6–68.8 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 83.2% | 77.7–88.0 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 18.0% | 15.1–20.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 8.8% | 6.1–12.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 16.6% | 12.8–21.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 32.8% | 28.1–38.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 12.8% | 10.1–16.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 14.5% | 12.3–17.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 10.8% | 8.9–13.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 10.1% | 8.1–12.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 21.7% | 17.7–26.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.7% | 4.0–5.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 5.8% | 4.6–7.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 9.6% | 7.6–12.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.6% | 2.1–3.6 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.3% | 2.7–4.3 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.2% | 16.0–23.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.7% | 6.0–13.1 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 7.5% | 4.9–12.0 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.0% | 6.0–10.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 5.6% | 4.3–7.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 30.7% | 26.3–35.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.1% | 3.9–6.5 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 21.5% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 15.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 5.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 1.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 29.2% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 5.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 91.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 23.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 27.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730 |
| Homeownership rate | 68.4% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 4.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746 |
| Single-parent households | 80.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 54.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716 |
| Population 65+ | 41.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746 |
| Median age | 62.7 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626 |
| Median home value | $261,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured