Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

04086

in Topsham, MainePopulation 9,706

55.98/ 100

Ranked #8,299 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #77 of 408 Maine ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #43 of 82 Portland-South Portland, ME ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

27.5%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.3%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.4 mi

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.8%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST83rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.52 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.5%

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.1%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST75th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.73 per 1,000 residents

in the top 13.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

87.3%

in the top 18% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Topsham, Maine (ZIP 04086) lands in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,299th) and the top 19% of Maine (77th).

continue reading

Taken together, the profile's clearest strengths surface right away: lead in tap water lies at the national minimum, and modeled short sleep resides in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Modeled mammography lands in the top 4.4% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Childcare sits in the top 9.7% nationally, modeled food insecurity rests in the bottom 9.8% nationally, and modeled colon screening is in the top 7.0% nationally. Outpatient stands in the top 10.8% nationally. Against that, modeled arsenic settles in the top 3.8% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lies in the bottom 5.3% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 04011, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Portland-South Portland, ME metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.1%31.2–37.1
High blood pressure among adults35.5%32.3–38.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.3%10.3–12.3
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.8–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%6.9–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.7–9.1
Depression among adults26.3%23.3–29.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.7%9.2–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%35.6–42.3
Obesity among adults28.7%24.4–33.3
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.5%9.5–14.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.4–8.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.0%75.1–80.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.1%80.6–85.4
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.8–90.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.1%69.5–76.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.9%62.9–69.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.8%76.7–86.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.6–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.9%10.7–15.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.8%18.5–25.6
Short sleep duration among adults28.3%24.4–32.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.4%14.1–19.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%13.7–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%11.9–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.7–15.4
Any disability among adults30.2%26.7–34.2
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.8–9.9
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Mobility disability among adults13.9%12.0–16.2
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.2%17.5–23.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.9–10.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.0%8.9–13.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.5–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.3–7.2
Loneliness among adults29.4%25.9–33.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.4–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–647.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)3.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)50.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle4.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription94.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate78.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population3.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households59.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+24.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age44.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$91,028$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$360,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$1,355$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.7 yr ± 1.4178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (76.1–82.5) n=363

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.41 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured