Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

22952

in Lyndhurst, VirginiaPopulation 1,694

56.07/ 100

Ranked #8,193 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #234 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #1 of 21 Staunton-Stuarts Draft, VA ZIPs (top 4.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

58.5%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

87.7%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.9%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.66%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Lyndhurst, Virginia (ZIP 22952), on the composite measure, lands in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,193rd) and the top 27% of Virginia (234th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: park land settles in the top 1.7% nationally, modeled tree cover stands in the top 2.0% nationally, and modeled colon screening is in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff rests in the bottom 10.9% nationally, homeownership sits in the top 11.1% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity registers in the bottom 12.3% nationally. Modeled transportation lands in the bottom 12.4% nationally, and food insecurity resides in the bottom 14.1% nationally. Crowded housing lies at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Working the other way, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 22920, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Staunton-Stuarts Draft, VA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.1%28.7–35.8
High blood pressure among adults38.4%34.3–42.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.6–11.7
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.6–8.6
Depression among adults24.0%20.6–27.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.3–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.7%37.4–46.2
Obesity among adults39.4%32.5–47.1
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.2–11.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%5.9–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.0%77.1–82.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.9%77.7–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults89.1%87.5–90.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.9%68.4–77.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.4%66.1–72.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.2%70.0–83.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.5–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.5%11.5–15.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.0%20.1–28.6
Short sleep duration among adults34.3%28.8–40.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.8%15.4–20.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.0–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.5–16.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%12.2–15.7
Any disability among adults32.9%28.8–37.6
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.1–9.1
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.5
Mobility disability among adults15.1%13.1–17.3
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.2%17.1–23.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.6–10.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.9–8.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.4–9.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.7–6.2
Loneliness among adults31.7%26.9–36.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.1–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–6416.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)7.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)3.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle7.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription82.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate93.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population1.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households55.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+25.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age45.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$75,333$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$262,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,153$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.6 yr ± 0.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.79 years of 77.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured