Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

13024

in Auburn, New YorkPopulation 1,230

33.02/ 100

Ranked #30,043 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.4%)

Ranked #1,725 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 0.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

40.9%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

53.6%

in the top 0.03% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

44.3%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

37.9%

in the top 0.09% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0 intersections/sq mi

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

26.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

45.4%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

23.4%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

50.1%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

34.1%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 13024, one of several in Auburn, New York ranks in the bottom 6.4% nationally (30,043rd) and the bottom 0.3% of New York (1,725th).

continue reading

Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled tooth loss stands in the top 0.4% nationally, and short sleep settles in the top 0.03% nationally. Modeled colon screening lies in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and housing insecurity resides in the top 0.09% nationally. Walkability lands at the national minimum, modeled utility shutoff registers in the top 0.4% nationally, and modeled food insecurity sits in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled transportation rests in the top 1.0% nationally, obesity is in the top 0.7% nationally, and fair or poor health stands in the top 3.3% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 13021, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.3%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.4%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.01%

11%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.10%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults17.2%14.8–19.8
High blood pressure among adults40.1%35.8–44.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults2.7%2.4–3.1
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.6–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.3–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.3–9.2
Depression among adults15.0%12.5–17.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.4%12.5–16.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.4%26.4–34.5
Obesity among adults50.1%42.4–57.7
Stroke among adults3.9%3.3–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years40.9%35.2–47.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years20.2%15.7–25.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure62.9%58.6–66.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.7%69.2–77.6
Cholesterol screening among adults76.7%72.7–80.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years44.3%39.1–49.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults28.7%25.6–32.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.8%15.4–22.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults27.8%22.8–32.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults40.7%34.3–47.6
Short sleep duration among adults53.6%47.1–60.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults34.1%28.5–40.2
Frequent mental distress among adults20.0%17.4–22.8
Frequent physical distress among adults16.7%14.2–19.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.8%17.4–24.6
Any disability among adults39.2%33.2–45.5
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.5–5.9
Independent living disability among adults12.3%10.1–14.7
Mobility disability among adults16.0%13.3–19.2
Self-care disability among adults7.5%6.2–9.1
Vision disability among adults10.2%8.5–12.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults40.1%34.5–45.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults45.4%37.0–52.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults46.3%38.0–53.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults37.9%31.6–43.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults23.4%19.2–27.5
Loneliness among adults40.5%34.7–46.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults26.8%22.5–30.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–649.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)75.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population2.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+4.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age38.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.9 yr ± 3.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.74 years of 73.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured