Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

68039

in Macy, NebraskaPopulation 793

37.28/ 100

Ranked #28,399 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 11.5%)

Ranked #563 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (bottom 0.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Unemployment rate

30.5%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

27.1%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

21.5%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.5 pCi/L

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST46th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

26.3%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

54.2%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

47.2%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

17.5%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

26%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People living in poverty
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity

Barriers to reaching care

  • Distance to the nearest community health center
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Households with no vehicle

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

In overall standing, Macy, Nebraska (ZIP 68039) comes out in the bottom 11.5% nationally (28,399th) and the bottom 0.6% of Nebraska (563rd).

continue reading

The measures that shape daily life here come through in the data: unemployment settles in the top 0.8% nationally, crowded housing registers in the top 1.1% nationally, and modeled radon stands in the top 4.9% nationally. Homeownership lands in the bottom 2.7% nationally, modeled colon screening is in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and modeled obesity resides in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled transportation rests in the top 3.7% nationally, and tooth loss lies in the top 6.2% nationally. More encouragingly, childcare sits in the top 0.8% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol settles in the bottom 1.7% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, childcare runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 51055, just across the boundary. This ZIP further shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.3%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 1.0%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.4%18.1–23.1
High blood pressure among adults33.2%29.6–37.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Current asthma among adults12.8%11.4–14.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%5.9–8.1
Depression among adults18.6%15.9–21.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.9%12.2–15.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened27.1%23.9–30.5
Obesity among adults47.2%40.7–53.9
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years26.0%21.7–30.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.2%8.6–14.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.0%69.2–74.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.5%69.6–77.3
Cholesterol screening among adults75.6%72.1–78.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.2%48.9–59.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.7%44.9–52.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.6%60.4–76.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.4%17.3–24.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.9%20.1–27.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.0%26.3–36.1
Short sleep duration among adults39.1%32.9–45.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.0%21.5–28.9
Frequent mental distress among adults20.2%17.7–22.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.5–17.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.5%15.8–21.5
Any disability among adults39.0%34.1–44.2
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.3
Independent living disability among adults11.5%9.9–13.5
Mobility disability among adults15.7%13.5–18.0
Self-care disability among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
Vision disability among adults8.4%7.3–9.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.3%24.6–34.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults31.0%25.3–36.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.5%17.2–26.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.3%17.4–25.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.5%14.7–20.5
Loneliness among adults37.0%31.4–42.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.8%13.2–18.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate30.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–6424.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)19.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)30.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle17.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription89.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate26.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)21.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population1.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households44.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+8.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age24.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$46,313$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$55,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$666$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 1.3178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.31 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured