Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12780

in Sparrow Bush, New YorkPopulation 2,346

58.03/ 100

Ranked #6,367 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #774 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #63 of 77 Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

83.7%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

11.7%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.2 mi

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.8%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.69%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Sparrow Bush, New York (ZIP 12780) lands in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,367th) and the top 45% of New York (774th).

continue reading

A handful of measures stand out most sharply across the profile here: modeled tree cover registers in the top 3.5% nationally, and poverty rests in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Childcare lands in the top 13.1% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits in the top 14.0% nationally. Crowded housing is at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. On the other side, unemployment settles in the top 6.8% nationally, distance to a Superfund site resides in the bottom 7.9% nationally, and slow internet speeds registers in the top 15% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 12770, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.7%24.8–30.7
High blood pressure among adults33.2%29.8–36.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.6–10.4
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.7–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%6.0–8.1
Depression among adults19.4%16.7–22.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.3–12.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.6%32.9–40.3
Obesity among adults31.0%26.0–36.4
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.3%12.3–18.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.9%4.9–7.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%74.9–80.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%77.4–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults89.8%88.4–91.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.1%65.4–74.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.0%63.7–70.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.7%71.9–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%12.9–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.7%10.6–14.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.1%20.3–27.9
Short sleep duration among adults36.8%31.8–41.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.8%14.5–19.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.4–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%12.0–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%10.8–14.2
Any disability among adults26.9%23.5–30.7
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.5–7.0
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.6
Mobility disability among adults12.8%11.1–14.8
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.2%20.2–26.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.2–14.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.7–12.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.8–13.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.2–8.1
Loneliness among adults30.8%26.8–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.6–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–644.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)6.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)11.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle2.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription93.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate75.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population4.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households54.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+28.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age52.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$74,468$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$221,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,216$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.6 yr ± 2.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.70 years of 82.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured