Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12518

in Cornwall, New YorkPopulation 6,114

67.58/ 100

Ranked #1,122 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 3.5%)

Ranked #168 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 9.8%)

Ranked #2 of 77 Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY ZIPs (top 2.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

38.8%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.71 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.7%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.7%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.2%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.49%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.4%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Cornwall, New York (ZIP 12518) sits in the top 3.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,122nd) and the top 9.8% of New York (168th).

continue reading

Reading across the measures, this area's clearest strengths come through: park land resides in the top 3.4% nationally, outpatient lies in the top 3.8% nationally, and mental-health providers settles in the top 5.2% nationally. Physicians stands in the top 5.6% nationally, modeled colon screening is in the top 3.5% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability rests in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Modeled loneliness sits in the bottom 8.4% nationally, and grocery registers in the top 8.9% nationally. Floodplain exposure lands in the bottom 9.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. ZIP 12520, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.7 ± 2.6 years. A median household income of $101,208 predicts 80.1 years — 3.5 years above.

    Ranked #280 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.3%22.4–28.2
High blood pressure among adults30.6%27.1–34.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.7–10.4
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.0–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.2%4.4–6.1
Depression among adults17.6%15.0–20.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.3%8.0–10.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.6%31.8–39.4
Obesity among adults28.5%23.6–33.6
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.7%7.7–12.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.8%3.9–5.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.1–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.2%78.2–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults91.5%90.2–92.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.7%70.4–78.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.0%68.9–74.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.8%74.5–86.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%13.0–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.1%7.4–11.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.8%16.5–23.4
Short sleep duration among adults34.6%29.6–39.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.4%11.4–15.6
Frequent mental distress among adults13.7%12.1–15.5
Frequent physical distress among adults11.3%9.9–12.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.7%8.4–11.2
Any disability among adults22.3%19.2–25.7
Hearing disability among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Independent living disability among adults5.8%5.0–6.7
Mobility disability among adults10.3%8.7–12.1
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.4–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.4%17.6–23.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.3–10.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.7–8.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.5–10.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.7–6.3
Loneliness among adults28.2%24.4–32.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.3–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–644.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)3.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)50.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription96.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate68.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population6.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households43.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+18.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age41.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$101,208$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$432,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,819$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.7 yr ± 1.3278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.32 years of 83.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured