Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

10973

in Slate Hill, New YorkPopulation 2,358

63.61/ 100

Ranked #2,657 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 8.3%)

Ranked #355 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #26 of 77 Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Pharmacy access

0.49 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.5%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

10.2%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.97 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.6%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.3%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.3%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST36th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

2.0%

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US25th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Slate Hill, New York (ZIP 10973) ranks in the top 8.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,657th) and the top 21% of New York (355th).

continue reading

A number of measures place this area on solid footing: pharmacy rests in the top 5.4% nationally, and recreation stands in the top 9.4% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled cognitive disability lands in the bottom 7.8% nationally, modeled hearing disability sits in the bottom 9.0% nationally, and household income is in the top 10.6% nationally. Modeled mammography settles in the top 10.1% nationally. By contrast, slow internet speeds resides in the top 7.8% nationally, and unemployment registers in the top 9.2% nationally. Fiber broadband rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 10969, about 3.0 miles away, ranks healthier overall. On other measures, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.3%22.6–28.3
High blood pressure among adults31.0%27.7–34.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.1–9.8
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.6%4.7–6.6
Depression among adults18.1%15.6–20.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.9%8.5–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%31.9–39.3
Obesity among adults29.8%25.0–35.1
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.1%8.0–12.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.3%4.4–6.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%73.7–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%77.4–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults90.6%89.2–91.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.8%65.0–74.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.2%67.0–73.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.2%73.7–85.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%13.2–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.4%8.5–12.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.4%17.8–25.2
Short sleep duration among adults35.7%30.6–40.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.5%12.3–17.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%12.9–16.7
Frequent physical distress among adults12.0%10.4–13.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.6%9.2–12.2
Any disability among adults23.3%20.0–26.9
Hearing disability among adults5.3%4.6–6.0
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.4–7.2
Mobility disability among adults10.8%9.1–12.7
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.6–25.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.4–12.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.6–10.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.5–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.2–7.0
Loneliness among adults29.3%25.3–33.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.8–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–643.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)6.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)10.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle4.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription89.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate85.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population8.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households64.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+20.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age33.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$117,167$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$410,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,810$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.4 yr ± 1.1678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.16 years of 76.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured