Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12475

in Ruby, New YorkPopulation 557

59.60/ 100

Ranked #5,149 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #640 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranked #23 of 52 Kingston, NY ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

76.7%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

64.4%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

21.8%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

70.3%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.8%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US8th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US9th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

10.5%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Ruby, New York (ZIP 12475) places in the top 16% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,149th) and the top 37% of New York (640th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled transportation noise lies at the national minimum, and colon screening rests in the top 1.3% nationally. Floodplain exposure resides at the national minimum. Unemployment is at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk lands in the bottom 7.9% nationally, and expected annual loss stands in the bottom 9.5% nationally. Pulling the other way, home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 4.0% nationally, households without a vehicle settles in the top 4.0% nationally, and modeled pfas sits in the top 4.4% nationally. Slow internet speeds lies in the top 6.4% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 12498, about 2.0 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kingston, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.1%26.0–32.3
High blood pressure among adults35.3%31.6–39.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.0–11.2
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.1–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.4–8.0
Depression among adults21.0%18.0–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.8%8.4–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.8%34.0–41.8
Obesity among adults29.3%24.0–35.0
Stroke among adults3.2%2.8–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.0%9.7–14.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%3.9–6.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%75.7–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.2%79.3–84.9
Cholesterol screening among adults91.3%89.8–92.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years76.7%72.4–80.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.7%61.2–68.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.9%68.8–81.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.3–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.3%9.1–13.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.3%18.4–26.8
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%31.9–42.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.8%12.4–17.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.7–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.3–15.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.4%9.8–13.3
Any disability among adults24.8%21.1–29.0
Hearing disability among adults5.6%4.9–6.3
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.0–8.1
Mobility disability among adults12.3%10.2–14.5
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.7–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.0%18.5–25.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.1–12.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.9%6.8–11.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.0–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.1–7.2
Loneliness among adults30.4%25.7–35.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.5–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)2.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle21.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription64.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate58.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population8.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households33.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+21.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age38.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$103,412$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$455,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 0.9478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.94 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured