Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11208

in Brooklyn, New YorkPopulation 105,428

50.70/ 100

Ranked #15,269 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #1,394 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #782 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 8.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

3,687 units

in the top 0.06% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

58.8%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

19.5%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

28.7%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

210 intersections/sq mi

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.9%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

24.9%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

10 ppb

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

US97th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

36.4%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

48.5%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 11208, one of several in Brooklyn, New York ranks in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,269th) and the bottom 19% of New York (1,394th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 0.06% nationally, and walkability lies in the top 2.2% nationally. Against that, households without a vehicle resides in the top 0.8% nationally, and crowded housing lands in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity registers in the top 2.2% nationally, modeled short sleep sits in the top 3.2% nationally, and homeownership rests in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Lead in tap water is in the top 2.6% nationally, modeled food insecurity stands in the top 3.0% nationally, and housing-cost burden settles in the top 3.7% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 11385, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.9 ± 0.8 years. A median household income of $62,077 predicts 78.2 years — 1.3 years below.

    Ranked #1,617 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.9 ± 0.8 years. The 46 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.6 years — 3.7 years below them.

    Ranked #2,879 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.2%17.7–20.7
High blood pressure among adults30.8%28.8–32.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.0%3.6–4.3
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.7–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%5.0–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.5–6.6
Depression among adults15.1%13.6–16.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.0%12.7–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.1%33.9–38.2
Obesity among adults28.8%26.1–31.5
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.7%15.8–21.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.1%13.6–16.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.9%69.5–74.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.5%76.5–80.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.9–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.0%54.3–61.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.8%46.0–51.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.2%72.0–82.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%14.1–17.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.6%13.2–16.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.7%31.1–36.3
Short sleep duration among adults44.9%41.7–48.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.7%23.8–27.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.6–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.7–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.8–17.6
Any disability among adults31.5%29.2–33.9
Hearing disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
Independent living disability among adults10.7%9.8–11.6
Mobility disability among adults16.7%15.3–18.1
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.5–6.4
Vision disability among adults8.8%8.2–9.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults36.6%33.6–39.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults36.4%33.6–39.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults29.9%27.5–32.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.7%26.2–31.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.3%14.8–17.8
Loneliness among adults40.1%36.9–43.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults16.5%14.8–18.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–648.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)20.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)7.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle58.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription94.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)48.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate24.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)19.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population42.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households29.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+12.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age35.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$62,077$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$679,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,651$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.9 yr ± 0.4278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.42 years of 76.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured