Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14723

in Cherry Creek, New YorkPopulation 1,187

50.73/ 100

Ranked #15,227 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #1,393 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

2.1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US9th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

26%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

77.3%

in the bottom 12.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

12.6%

in the bottom 13.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.5 pCi/L

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US79th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Cherry Creek, New York (ZIP 14723) lands in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,227th) and the bottom 19% of New York (1,393rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A handful of measures stand out most sharply across the profile here: modeled disaster risk registers in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Modeled extreme heat rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise lies in the bottom 11.6% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 13.4% nationally. On the other side, walkability sits in the bottom 8.0% nationally, poverty is in the top 9.8% nationally, and unemployment settles in the top 10.5% nationally. Home broadband subscription resides in the bottom 12.7% nationally, and crowded housing registers in the top 13.7% nationally.

A note on the terms: disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 14062, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.4%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.3%26.0–32.5
High blood pressure among adults36.2%32.2–40.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.4–10.3
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.6–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%7.4–9.9
Depression among adults21.3%18.0–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.1–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%33.8–42.2
Obesity among adults36.3%29.6–43.2
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.6%14.6–21.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.2–8.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%74.6–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.3%76.8–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%85.8–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.0%62.0–71.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.7%54.2–61.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.2%70.1–83.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%14.6–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.1%13.6–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.1%22.7–31.3
Short sleep duration among adults40.1%34.2–46.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.7%16.8–22.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.4–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.1%13.2–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.6–16.4
Any disability among adults30.2%26.0–34.2
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Independent living disability among adults9.0%7.8–10.2
Mobility disability among adults14.9%12.6–17.1
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.5–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%20.2–27.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.4%12.6–18.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.7%12.1–17.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.6–15.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.1–9.6
Loneliness among adults31.6%26.8–36.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.7–9.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–645.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)16.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)9.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle9.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription77.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate90.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households64.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+23.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age44.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$68,261$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$141,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$738$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 1.1778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.17 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured