Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11550

in Hempstead, New YorkPopulation 60,960

51.89/ 100

Ranked #13,595 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #1,308 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #772 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 9.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

49.7%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

1,643 units

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

13.8%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

190 intersections/sq mi

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

26.3%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

22.8%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

47%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, ZIP 11550, one of several in Hempstead, New York sits in the top 42% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,595th) and the bottom 24% of New York (1,308th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 0.5% nationally, walkability stands in the top 2.8% nationally, and floodplain exposure is at the national minimum. Working the other way, modeled short sleep rests in the top 0.4% nationally, PFOS in drinking water sits at the national maximum, and crowded housing registers in the top 2.6% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lands in the top 3.3% nationally, and households without a vehicle resides in the top 3.7% nationally. Housing-cost burden lies in the top 4.3% nationally, and modeled tree cover settles at the national minimum.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 11510, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.3 ± 1.4 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 82.7 years — 2.4 years below them.

    Ranked #1,845 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.6%19.6–23.5
High blood pressure among adults35.2%32.6–37.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.8%4.4–5.3
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.1–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%5.2–6.3
Depression among adults13.2%11.4–14.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.9%12.4–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.1%33.4–38.8
Obesity among adults38.5%34.4–42.5
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.5%15.5–21.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.6%13.6–17.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%75.3–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%77.7–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.8–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.5%57.7–65.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.7%49.6–55.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.1%68.5–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.9%12.0–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.0%11.4–14.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.5%32.0–38.8
Short sleep duration among adults49.7%45.9–53.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.2%22.8–27.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%15.2–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.8%13.3–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%13.5–16.5
Any disability among adults32.3%29.2–35.3
Hearing disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.5
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.8–10.7
Mobility disability among adults16.0%14.3–17.6
Self-care disability among adults5.4%5.0–5.8
Vision disability among adults7.9%7.3–8.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults33.4%29.9–36.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults30.0%26.9–33.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.8%22.2–27.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.3%23.5–28.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.3%12.8–15.9
Loneliness among adults37.4%33.5–41.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.8–16.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6415.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)23.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)9.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle22.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription91.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)47.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate49.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)13.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population38.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households30.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+13.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age38.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$92,677$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$465,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,626$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.3 yr ± 0.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.69 years of 80.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured