Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

08078

in Runnemede, New JerseyPopulation 8,051

57.04/ 100

Ranked #7,232 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #432 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #206 of 361 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOA in drinking water

96.6%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST58th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

96.6%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

110 intersections/sq mi

in the top 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST74th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

18.5%

in the top 14.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Runnemede, New Jersey (ZIP 08078) sits in the top 23% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,232nd) and the bottom 26% of New Jersey (432nd).

continue reading

A healthy showing across the board, and a few measures carry it: transit rests in the top 5.9% nationally, walkability settles in the top 9.0% nationally, and modeled obesity lands in the bottom 13.3% nationally. Park land rests in the top 14.4% nationally, and modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 15% nationally. On the other hand, PFOA in drinking water lands in the top 5.7% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water rests in the top 5.9% nationally. PFAS in drinking water settles in the top 14.2% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise lands in the top 16% nationally. Modeled binge drinking rests in the top 14.9% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 08007, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.1 ± 1.8 years. A median household income of $86,741 predicts 79.5 years — 4.5 years below.

    Ranked #5,316 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.1 ± 1.8 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.8 years — 2.8 years below them.

    Ranked #2,171 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.2%21.8–26.6
High blood pressure among adults31.4%28.4–34.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.2–8.8
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Depression among adults19.8%17.2–22.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.8%8.5–11.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.5%34.3–40.8
Obesity among adults28.7%24.4–33.1
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.4%9.4–13.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.5%7.9–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.1%72.3–77.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.3%73.0–79.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%85.9–89.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.0%62.9–71.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.6%61.5–67.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.7%68.2–80.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.5%15.8–21.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.0%11.8–16.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.4%21.1–28.1
Short sleep duration among adults37.8%33.6–42.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.7%14.5–19.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.5–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.7–14.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%11.9–15.4
Any disability among adults27.5%24.4–31.0
Hearing disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.5–8.5
Mobility disability among adults11.5%9.9–13.2
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.9–26.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.3–15.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.1–10.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%10.0–13.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.3–8.3
Loneliness among adults33.3%29.5–37.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.9–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–647.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)6.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)6.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle8.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription93.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate72.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population7.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households50.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+17.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age36.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$86,741$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$250,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$1,407$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.1 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 75.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured