Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

08003

in Cherry Hill, New JerseyPopulation 31,809

70.93/ 100

Ranked #426 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 1.4%)

Ranked #90 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranked #12 of 361 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD ZIPs (top 3.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$155,059

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.2%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.5%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.0%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.9%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

524 units

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

98.3%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

98.3%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.0%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.8%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 08003, one of several in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, by its composite score, sits in the top 1.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (426th) and the top 15% of New Jersey (90th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: household income sits in the top 3.4% nationally, and modeled obesity lies in the bottom 3.2% nationally. Modeled transportation rests in the bottom 3.8% nationally, and utility shutoff resides in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability is in the bottom 1.9% nationally, subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 4.2% nationally, and modeled independent living disability stands in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Modeled food insecurity registers in the bottom 6.6% nationally. On the other side, PFOA in drinking water settles in the top 4.7% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water sits in the top 5.0% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 08033, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 99%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.3 ± 1.3 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.9 years — 4.4 years above them.

    Ranked #247 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.2%20.8–25.8
High blood pressure among adults30.9%28.0–34.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.1–9.8
Current asthma among adults8.6%7.6–9.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
Depression among adults15.9%13.7–18.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.8%36.4–43.2
Obesity among adults23.2%19.5–27.1
Stroke among adults2.7%2.4–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.7%3.8–5.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.8%4.9–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.6%75.7–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%77.0–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults91.5%90.4–92.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.1%64.3–72.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.1%69.5–74.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.4%73.7–84.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.3%13.9–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.2%7.0–9.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.9%16.3–21.7
Short sleep duration among adults34.6%30.5–39.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.1%10.6–13.8
Frequent mental distress among adults12.5%11.1–14.0
Frequent physical distress among adults10.2%9.1–11.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.9%7.9–10.0
Any disability among adults21.4%18.8–24.1
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Independent living disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
Mobility disability among adults9.0%7.8–10.3
Self-care disability among adults2.3%2.1–2.6
Vision disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%17.3–22.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.5–9.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.1%3.4–4.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.9–8.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
Loneliness among adults29.6%26.2–33.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.0%3.4–4.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–641.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)3.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)66.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)5.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription97.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate84.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population17.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households51.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+19.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age45.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$155,059$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$443,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$1,638$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.3 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 82.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured