Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

06441

in Higganum, ConnecticutPopulation 5,348

65.93/ 100

Ranked #1,651 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.2%)

Ranked #70 of 277 Connecticut ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #23 of 95 Hartford-East Hartford-Middletown, CT ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.7%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

6.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

76.3%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.3%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.7%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

11.5%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.4%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.8%

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

76.4%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Higganum, Connecticut (ZIP 06441) comes out in the top 5.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,651st) and the top 25% of Connecticut (70th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled expected annual loss is at the national minimum, modeled food insecurity resides in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and transit rests in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled colon screening lies in the top 1.6% nationally, loneliness sits in the bottom 4.1% nationally, and transportation settles in the bottom 5.1% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health registers in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and mobility disability stands in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lands in the bottom 6.0% nationally, and tree cover is in the top 6.4% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 06419, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Hartford-East Hartford-Middletown, CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.4 ± 2.3 years. A median household income of $111,250 predicts 80.5 years — 2.9 years above.

    Ranked #468 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 26.6; chronic-disease standing 81.9 — 55 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,928 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.9%24.3–29.7
High blood pressure among adults31.6%28.6–34.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.0–10.9
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%4.9–6.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.0%4.1–5.9
Depression among adults22.4%19.7–25.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.3%7.1–9.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.7%35.6–42.2
Obesity among adults27.7%23.4–32.4
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.1%4.9–7.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%4.1–6.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.8%73.7–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.6%79.9–85.0
Cholesterol screening among adults91.9%90.5–93.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years76.3%73.0–79.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults78.2%75.8–80.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.6%76.9–86.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%14.9–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.2%7.4–11.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.1%15.2–21.5
Short sleep duration among adults31.4%27.5–36.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.5%9.7–13.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.0%12.3–15.9
Frequent physical distress among adults10.8%9.4–12.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.9%8.5–11.6
Any disability among adults19.7%16.8–23.0
Hearing disability among adults5.7%5.0–6.6
Independent living disability among adults5.3%4.6–6.2
Mobility disability among adults8.4%7.1–10.0
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.1–2.9
Vision disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.7%17.8–23.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.3–8.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.0–6.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.5–8.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.9–5.5
Loneliness among adults27.3%23.9–30.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.7–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (2.3–20.8%) n=278
Uninsured 18–642.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.5% (1.2–12.9%) n=277
No HS diploma (25+)1.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.6% (1.1–14.3%) n=278
Bachelor's or higher (25+)45.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50543.6% (19.2–70.7%) n=278
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–9.1%) n=277
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–13.7%) n=278
Broadband subscription97.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.7% (86.9–98.8%) n=278
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.3% (18.2–44.9%) n=278
Homeownership rate88.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.1% (41.3–93.1%) n=278
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.8%) n=278
Foreign-born population6.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5539.3% (2.1–22.3%) n=278
Single-parent households45.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.1% (36.0–68.7%) n=277
Population 65+18.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.8% (13.4–30.2%) n=278
Median age43.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.1 yr (34.7–53.2) n=278
Median household income$111,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$107,247 ($63,371–$163,278) n=270
Median home value$393,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$365,900 ($239,080–$622,060) n=268
Median gross rent$1,458$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,450 ($1,128–$2,175) n=247
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.4 yr ± 1.1778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (77.7–83.5) n=266

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.17 years of 83.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured