ZIP code
06232
in Andover, ConnecticutPopulation 3,152
67.68/ 100
Ranked #1,096 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 3.5%)
Ranked #39 of 277 Connecticut ZIPs (top 14.1%)
Ranked #10 of 95 Hartford-East Hartford-Middletown, CT ZIPs (top 10.6%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Expected annual disaster loss
$0
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Mammography
84.6%
in the top 0.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
6.9%
in the bottom 3.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST15thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
73.3%
in the top 3.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST63rdUS97thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
4.6%
in the bottom 4.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST19thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Median household income
$134,632
in the top 6.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST80thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
6.6%
in the bottom 4.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST21stUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
75%
in the top 3.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST66thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
11.6%
in the bottom 2.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST15thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
8.4%
in the bottom 4.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST11thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, Andover, Connecticut (ZIP 06232) lands in the top 3.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,096th) and the top 14.1% of Connecticut (39th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled expected annual loss stands at the national minimum, and mammography lies in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled food insecurity lands in the bottom 3.3% nationally, and transportation sits in the bottom 4.4% nationally. Household income is in the top 6.1% nationally, modeled housing insecurity settles in the bottom 4.9% nationally, and modeled colon screening resides in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health registers in the bottom 2.7% nationally, and mobility disability rests in the bottom 4.0% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas stands in the top 3.5% nationally.
Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 06248, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Hartford-East Hartford-Middletown, CT metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 83%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 85%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 98%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 94%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 82%
8%
Disability
healthier than 96%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 92%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 46%
14%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 34%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 77%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 70%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 67%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 80%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 86%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 66%
8%
Disability
healthier than 84%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 98%
5%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 4%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 89%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 67%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 76%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 69%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 90%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 75%
8%
Disability
healthier than 87%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
in the top 0.5%
5%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 7%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
06043
Connecticutshares a border
Score 64.12
Closest healthier
06248
Connecticutshares a border
Score 68.48
Similar health profile
06061
Connecticut100% similar profile
Score 67.36
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 25.3% | 22.6–28.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 30.3% | 27.1–33.5 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.2% | 9.2–11.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.6% | 9.5–12.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 5.3% | 4.5–6.1 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 4.8% | 3.8–5.9 |
| Depression among adults | 20.9% | 18.3–24.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 8.0% | 6.7–9.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 39.5% | 36.2–43.2 |
| Obesity among adults | 29.5% | 24.9–34.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.6% | 2.2–3.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 4.6% | 3.6–5.7 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 4.9% | 3.7–6.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 78.0% | 75.0–80.9 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 81.1% | 78.5–83.8 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 91.8% | 90.4–93.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 75.0% | 71.5–78.5 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 78.9% | 76.5–81.2 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 84.6% | 80.1–88.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.1% | 13.8–18.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 8.4% | 6.3–10.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 16.5% | 13.2–20.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 31.1% | 27.1–35.4 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 11.6% | 9.4–14.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 14.3% | 12.2–16.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 10.8% | 9.0–12.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 9.7% | 8.0–11.6 |
| Any disability among adults | 19.2% | 15.9–22.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 5.4% | 4.6–6.2 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 5.1% | 4.2–6.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 8.4% | 6.7–10.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.4% | 1.9–2.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 2.9% | 2.4–3.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.5% | 16.6–22.7 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 6.9% | 5.2–8.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 4.8% | 3.5–6.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 6.6% | 5.2–8.2 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 4.6% | 3.7–5.5 |
| Loneliness among adults | 29.8% | 26.1–33.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.4% | 3.6–5.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CT median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 1.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 5.8% (2.3–20.8%) n=278 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 3.9% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 4.5% (1.2–12.9%) n=277 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 1.9% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 4.6% (1.1–14.3%) n=278 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 46.5% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 43.6% (19.2–70.7%) n=278 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (1.6–9.1%) n=277 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.7% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.1% (0.0–13.7%) n=278 |
| Broadband subscription | 95.9% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.7% (86.9–98.8%) n=278 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 26.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 29.3% (18.2–44.9%) n=278 |
| Homeownership rate | 93.1% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.1% (41.3–93.1%) n=278 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.7% (0.0–3.8%) n=278 |
| Foreign-born population | 4.7% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 9.3% (2.1–22.3%) n=278 |
| Single-parent households | 65.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.1% (36.0–68.7%) n=277 |
| Population 65+ | 19.2% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.8% (13.4–30.2%) n=278 |
| Median age | 51.2 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 44.1 yr (34.7–53.2) n=278 |
| Median household income | $134,632 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $107,247 ($63,371–$163,278) n=270 |
| Median home value | $376,500 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $365,900 ($239,080–$622,060) n=268 |
| Median gross rent | $1,166 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,450 ($1,128–$2,175) n=247 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CT median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 85.2 yr ± 2.97 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 81.2 yr (77.7–83.5) n=266 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.97 years of 85.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured