ZIP code
06061
in Pine Meadow, ConnecticutPopulation 312
67.36/ 100
Ranked #1,172 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 3.7%)
Ranked #47 of 277 Connecticut ZIPs (top 17%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Expected annual disaster loss
$0
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
50.3%
in the bottom 1.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
6.2%
in the bottom 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST8thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
4.2%
in the bottom 2.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
5.9%
in the bottom 2.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
76.9%
in the top 1.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST89thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
4.0%
in the bottom 3.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›The read
By its overall health score, Pine Meadow, Connecticut (ZIP 06061) lands in the top 3.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,172nd) and the top 17% of Connecticut (47th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled expected annual loss sits at the national minimum, and food insecurity rests in the bottom 1.8% nationally. Housing-cost burden is at the national minimum, and modeled transportation stands in the bottom 2.2% nationally. Poverty settles at the national minimum, modeled housing insecurity lies in the bottom 2.4% nationally, and homeownership resides at the national maximum. Modeled colon screening lands in the top 1.2% nationally, and utility shutoff registers in the bottom 3.8% nationally. On the other hand, home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 1.5% nationally.
To translate a couple of terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 06057, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 84%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 85%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 98%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 90%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 83%
8%
Disability
healthier than 97%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 90%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 48%
14%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 36%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 80%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 70%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 73%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 73%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 76%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 67%
8%
Disability
healthier than 88%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 97%
5%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 4%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
06057
Connecticutshares a border
Score 67.37
Closest healthier
06022
Connecticutabout 1.0 mi away
Score 67.58
Similar health profile
06232
Connecticut100% similar profile
Score 67.68
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 27.0% | 24.1–30.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 28.9% | 25.9–32.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.4% | 9.3–11.5 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.5% | 9.3–12.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 5.1% | 4.3–6.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 4.9% | 3.7–6.6 |
| Depression among adults | 21.2% | 18.5–24.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 8.1% | 6.8–9.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 39.3% | 36.0–43.0 |
| Obesity among adults | 26.2% | 22.1–31.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.6% | 2.1–3.2 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 5.9% | 4.7–7.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 4.4% | 3.1–6.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 77.3% | 73.9–80.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 81.5% | 78.7–84.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 92.4% | 90.7–93.8 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 76.9% | 73.6–80.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 76.4% | 73.8–78.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 81.0% | 75.9–85.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 17.2% | 14.8–20.2 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 8.9% | 6.2–11.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 17.8% | 14.0–22.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 31.3% | 27.2–35.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 11.5% | 9.1–14.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 13.9% | 11.8–16.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 11.1% | 9.2–13.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 9.2% | 7.3–11.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 19.8% | 16.4–24.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 5.3% | 4.5–6.2 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 4.9% | 3.9–6.3 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 8.7% | 6.7–11.2 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.3% | 1.8–3.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 2.7% | 2.2–3.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 21.2% | 17.6–25.3 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 6.2% | 4.2–8.5 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 4.2% | 2.7–6.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 5.9% | 4.4–7.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 4.2% | 3.3–5.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 27.9% | 24.0–32.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.0% | 3.1–5.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CT median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 5.8% (2.3–20.8%) n=278 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 4.5% (1.2–12.9%) n=277 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 4.6% (1.1–14.3%) n=278 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 9.4% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 43.6% (19.2–70.7%) n=278 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (1.6–9.1%) n=277 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.1% (0.0–13.7%) n=278 |
| Broadband subscription | 50.3% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.7% (86.9–98.8%) n=278 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 29.3% (18.2–44.9%) n=278 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.1% (41.3–93.1%) n=278 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.7% (0.0–3.8%) n=278 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 9.3% (2.1–22.3%) n=278 |
| Single-parent households | 77.7% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.1% (36.0–68.7%) n=277 |
| Population 65+ | 76.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.8% (13.4–30.2%) n=278 |
| Median age | 74.2 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 44.1 yr (34.7–53.2) n=278 |
| Median household income | $75,704 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $107,247 ($63,371–$163,278) n=270 |
| Median home value | $180,500 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $365,900 ($239,080–$622,060) n=268 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,450 ($1,128–$2,175) n=247 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CT median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 83.1 yr ± 1.82 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 81.2 yr (77.7–83.5) n=266 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.82 years of 83.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured