Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

06355

in Mystic, ConnecticutPopulation 12,173

65.78/ 100

Ranked #1,702 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.4%)

Ranked #71 of 277 Connecticut ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #4 of 30 Norwich-New London, CT ZIPs (top 13.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

88.1%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

77.9%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.7%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.1%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.5%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$137,425

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST81st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.1%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.5%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

6.3%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Mystic, Connecticut (ZIP 06355), in overall standing, comes out in the top 5.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,702nd) and the top 26% of Connecticut (71st).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled expected annual loss is at the national minimum, colon screening lies in the top 0.7% nationally, and food insecurity registers in the bottom 2.9% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity is in the bottom 2.9% nationally, modeled transportation lies in the bottom 3.8% nationally, and household income registers in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff is in the bottom 4.4% nationally, and mammography lies in the top 3.1% nationally. On the other hand, modeled pfas registers in the top 0.6% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure is in the top 6.1% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 06390, about 0.7 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Norwich-New London, CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.4%27.6–33.5
High blood pressure among adults36.6%33.4–40.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.2%11.1–13.3
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.7–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.5%4.8–6.4
Depression among adults20.8%18.3–23.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.2%8.0–10.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%36.3–43.2
Obesity among adults27.9%23.8–32.8
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.0%4.8–7.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.2%4.4–6.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%78.2–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.1%81.8–86.5
Cholesterol screening among adults92.7%91.6–93.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years77.9%74.7–81.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults78.6%76.3–80.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.5%77.6–86.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%12.1–16.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.2%6.1–8.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.7%17.9–24.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.9%28.0–36.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.3%11.6–15.3
Frequent mental distress among adults12.8%11.4–14.5
Frequent physical distress among adults11.7%10.4–13.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.0%8.9–11.5
Any disability among adults25.7%22.8–29.2
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.3–8.1
Independent living disability among adults5.6%4.9–6.4
Mobility disability among adults11.1%9.6–12.9
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.3–3.0
Vision disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.0%17.4–22.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.6–7.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.8%3.9–5.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.2–7.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.5%4.0–5.2
Loneliness among adults28.5%25.1–32.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.1%3.5–4.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (2.3–20.8%) n=278
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.5% (1.2–12.9%) n=277
No HS diploma (25+)2.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.6% (1.1–14.3%) n=278
Bachelor's or higher (25+)56.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50543.6% (19.2–70.7%) n=278
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–9.1%) n=277
Households without a vehicle7.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–13.7%) n=278
Broadband subscription93.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.7% (86.9–98.8%) n=278
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.3% (18.2–44.9%) n=278
Homeownership rate81.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.1% (41.3–93.1%) n=278
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.8%) n=278
Foreign-born population6.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5539.3% (2.1–22.3%) n=278
Single-parent households60.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.1% (36.0–68.7%) n=277
Population 65+30.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.8% (13.4–30.2%) n=278
Median age53.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.1 yr (34.7–53.2) n=278
Median household income$137,425$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$107,247 ($63,371–$163,278) n=270
Median home value$453,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$365,900 ($239,080–$622,060) n=268
Median gross rent$1,915$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,450 ($1,128–$2,175) n=247
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.4 yr ± 0.9178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (77.7–83.5) n=266

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.91 years of 82.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured