Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03905

in Kittery Point, MainePopulation 2,084

58.55/ 100

Ranked #5,951 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #44 of 408 Maine ZIPs (top 10.8%)

Ranked #30 of 82 Portland-South Portland, ME ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Food insecurity

6.4%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

84.3%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$140,730

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.2%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.3%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.7%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

62.6%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

15.6%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST57th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Kittery Point, Maine (ZIP 03905) stands in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,951st) and the top 10.8% of Maine (44th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled food insecurity registers in the bottom 2.2% nationally, and mammography lies in the top 1.1% nationally. Household income is in the top 5.1% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity registers in the bottom 3.3% nationally. Modeled loneliness lies in the bottom 4.1% nationally, short sleep is in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and colon screening registers in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled transportation lies in the bottom 8.7% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas is in the top 7.0% nationally, and arsenic registers in the top 9.4% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. ZIP 03854, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby. Beyond the headline readings, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Portland-South Portland, ME metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 99%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.9%33.9–39.7
High blood pressure among adults40.3%37.0–43.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.9%12.7–15.1
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.7–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.5–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%6.7–9.6
Depression among adults22.6%20.0–25.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.1–13.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.3%39.1–45.3
Obesity among adults31.4%27.2–35.4
Stroke among adults3.8%3.3–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.0%6.6–9.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.8%4.6–7.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.7%80.2–84.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.7%82.6–86.6
Cholesterol screening among adults92.0%90.8–93.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.7%71.5–77.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.9%68.3–73.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years84.3%80.1–87.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%12.2–16.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.6%8.3–12.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.9%16.6–23.3
Short sleep duration among adults28.0%24.7–31.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.6%14.0–19.4
Frequent mental distress among adults13.6%11.8–15.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.1–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.2%10.4–14.0
Any disability among adults31.0%27.3–34.7
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.3–10.6
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.4–7.5
Mobility disability among adults13.6%11.5–15.8
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.6–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.1–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.2%16.8–21.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.1–8.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.3–10.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.2–7.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.4–6.0
Loneliness among adults27.3%24.4–30.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.9–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)64.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)7.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle0.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription96.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate82.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population2.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households50.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+30.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age51.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$140,730$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$541,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$2,533$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.7 yr ± 2.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (76.1–82.5) n=363

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.25 years of 84.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured