Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

04043

in Kennebunk, MainePopulation 11,820

59.41/ 100

Ranked #5,276 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #33 of 408 Maine ZIPs (top 8.1%)

Ranked #23 of 82 Portland-South Portland, ME ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

40.2%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.5%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

83%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.5%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.5%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.1%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.6%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST79th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.17 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.2%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Kennebunk, Maine (ZIP 04043) ranks in the top 16% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,276th) and the top 8.1% of Maine (33rd).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled food insecurity lies in the bottom 2.4% nationally, and mammography lands in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity sits in the bottom 4.4% nationally, and short sleep is in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Modeled loneliness settles in the bottom 7.9% nationally, modeled colon screening resides in the top 5.7% nationally, and grocery registers in the top 9.2% nationally. Modeled extreme heat rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation stands in the bottom 9.9% nationally. On the other side, modeled arsenic lies in the top 1.6% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 03907, about 5.2 miles away, ranks healthier overall. On other measures, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Portland-South Portland, ME metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.6%32.0–37.0
High blood pressure among adults37.5%34.6–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.8%11.8–13.9
Current asthma among adults12.3%11.1–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.4–8.4
Depression among adults23.5%20.9–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.6%9.3–11.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.8%36.8–42.7
Obesity among adults31.0%27.0–34.9
Stroke among adults3.6%3.2–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.7%8.8–12.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.6–6.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.3%78.8–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.7%81.5–85.7
Cholesterol screening among adults91.2%90.0–92.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.6%70.3–76.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.0%68.4–73.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years83.0%78.6–86.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%13.1–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.6%9.0–12.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.4%16.7–22.1
Short sleep duration among adults28.5%25.1–32.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.9%14.0–17.9
Frequent mental distress among adults14.4%12.9–16.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%11.1–13.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.7%11.2–14.2
Any disability among adults30.3%27.2–33.1
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.8–9.7
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.4
Mobility disability among adults12.9%11.3–14.7
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.3%17.1–21.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.4–7.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.7–9.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.5–7.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.6–5.9
Loneliness among adults28.1%25.2–31.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.2–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–642.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)3.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)51.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle4.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription92.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate80.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population7.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households68.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+30.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age54.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$107,804$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$487,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$1,425$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.0 yr ± 1.0178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (76.1–82.5) n=363

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.01 years of 81.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured